I gave logical reasoning for my opinion champ, not just "hes not the GOAT so its impossible" silly rhetoric
Getting back to the real reason we are looking at Pearce for hooker is the absolute lack of decent options NSW have to choose from there.
I know what logic is thanks. That is
not what I said in my previous post. I said
evidence. You presented no
evidence. You presented
opinion. It looks like you just ignored my previous post where I said "Sorry what evidence have you presented?" as your reply ignore its entire content.
Fact is you have presented
no evidence at all! You just retype the same stuff which is opinion.
You are entitled to it, but please things like "his a good passer" (for example) is not fact, it is opinion. Further, if you want to get down to specifics, what is a "good" passer? Good compared to what? To whom? It is meaningless in the context as you have no comparative basis.
You want to harp on about me bringing up Andrew Johns. Thing is how many players were able to do what he did, namely go from being a starting halfback in his club side to being an Origin Hooker without any training other than in the lead up to Origin games? As far as I am aware, he is the only one to do it. Hence if you could not grasp the point I was making that it takes someone of his ability to do make that kind of transition so successfully, in such a short period of time, at Origin level, then that is not my problem, just yours. If it was so easy, more people would have done it at Origin level wouldn't they?
As you seem to want to disregard what I said and just harp on about your opinion v my opinion, yet insist your opinion is "evidence", then there is no point discussing this further as you seem to not comprehend written English.
Go back to your cave and talk to Robin.
p.s.
Yes I know why people were talking about Pearce as a possible NSW origin hooker. Unlike some people I can read and more importantly comprehend what was said. Just I think it a bad idea as I don't think Mitchell Pearce will make a good hooker.