Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 85,038
It's not, because there'll be Parramatta players involved.Its like origin next week....
It's not, because there'll be Parramatta players involved.Its like origin next week....
Or Leutele's milked penalty after a 15 metre set on their own line that led to Bird's try.Saw a bit of flanno's tirade about the reffing at the PC just then. Bet he didn't mention the first try...
They should make it a Golden Shower like they used to.So is this not golden point? It goes for whole 10?
I don't know that the video does show no touch. Do we know that it's perfectly synced and has enough frames per second to show that? What could bend his fingers back like that at that exact moment?The video shows no touch.
The offside try taken from Manly. He was just offside? Maybe. But if let it roll walker pushes the panthers player before he gets to the ball so it would of been a penalty reguardless.
Gallen made 18 runs for 182 metres plus 54 tackles and none missed. But his two errors and a penalty undo all that? I don't f**king think so.How many years exactly?
How many years exactly?
Right, so by 'years' you mean 'two'? But in one of those two seasons they won the comp? Yeah, nah....
Yeah, Cronulla's first premiership in their history didn't justify or mean anything...
Exactly. Anyone bagging him has baggage.Gallen made 18 runs for 182 metres plus 54 tackles and none missed. But his two errors and a penalty undo all that? I don't f**king think so.
Updated! It was 19 runs for 195 metres and 55 tackles PLUS a linebreak assist.Gallen made 18 runs for 182 metres plus 54 tackles and none missed. But his two errors and a penalty undo all that? I don't f**king think so.
Yes. Because the only available footage when the decision was made indicated it was touched ... so a wrong decision was made on the evidence availableSo was Manly robbed?
Yes. Because the only available footage when the decision was made indicated it was touched ... so a wrong decision was made on the evidence available
I think the channel 9 sync'ed footage is horseshit ... it is milliseconds off which is more than enough to make it appear different
I did speak up ... are you deaf?So MAYBE he touched it is what your saying? Or 100% conclusive. Speak up.
Unless evidence is 100% we can not over turn.
Ink pink you stink.Hmmm, and you are a shit poet...View attachment 15322
Yep stupid theory. There was the odd poster here claiming the same thingMy brother just pointed out to me about luke Lewis a couple weeks back.
Bragging about its better to come 5th and avoid the storm.
Well look how well that turned out
I pretty much agree with this except there's a difference between the rules and the refs and bunker's guidelines.Barretts cried no try.
Ref has split 2nd and wouldnt see a finger. He called try. After watching videos I dont see enough evidence to over turn.
Same with KE knock on unfortunately.
You give HJ crap about his talk about lizard people but the dukes editing videos and leaking them onto the interent to help the reffs look good?I did speak up ... are you deaf?
He definitely touched it with his finger
The sync'ed footage is a channel 9 lie, created by Gus to cover up a monumental blunder
It doesn't matter whether he touches it with his hand (which he clearly does).
If that ball is passed into his chest it is called a knock on every single time. Why is it different for a kick?
A ludicrous decision.