How does preventing anyone from playing NRL stop them having a life?
Plenty of jobs worth far less and not in the public eye have far higher standards then we currently do. I think being on good to great money and in the public eye it's only fair we have decent standards on what sort of people we accept.
The sport would be better off if they drew a line in the sand on what is and isn't acceptable. Im happy for many lesser offences to get a second or even third chance. But some offences should not even have that.
Obviously that's not how we operate now. But to suggest it would deprive them of a life is not true. It would only deprive them of one job opportunity. One that they don't deserve.
This such an arbitrary decision though MX. We make a call whether a job opportunity is sufficiently good enough that he should be be denied it. So he applies to be a garbage collector, is it OK to do that job? What about nursing? Shop assistant? Bank teller? Is it a financial issue, or the jobs relative niceness the issue? He can't earn above $X and job can't be a job that is perceived to be nice. Can he paint the harbour bridge? What about mowing lawns? Or are those jobs outside and that is nicer than being inside so he is disqualified from those too. Can he clean toilets? But not ones in luxury hotels, only dirty public ones.
It makes no sense to me, that you stop him doing the job he is trained for and good at and hope he gets a job doing something else just because we perceive his job to be privileged. What if he can't get another job? Nobody will give him a chance because he has a criminal record and no experience in other jobs.
How does that help his victims get some financial compensation?
How does it help society because he now needs to be paid benefits and how does it help society because we are now creating an environment where he may reoffend as the hopelessness of his situation unfolds. We have now created more victims when he gets angry again and lashes out.
What if he was beaten every day of his life by his parents and that has caused his anger and aggression? What of he was molested by a priest and that has caused his anger and aggression? What if he has a chemical imbalance in his brain chemistry that was previously undiagnosed and that caused his anger and aggression?
There seems to be a need for retribution, revenge, punishment. No thought is given to the impact it has on everybody that it affects, including the victims. What about the bad things that have been done to him that make him the way he is? Do we just ignore them and say "tough, we know you were beaten/molested/have medical issues, we don't care, suffer you bastard'.
This issue is complex and how we handle it says much about humanity and what it stands for.