'10 | R25 | Sat | Knights 18-26 Dragons | EnergyAustralia

[Timmah]

Rodent - completely with you there, the refs then compounded it with another penalty two tackles later. Sa'u was at least 3 or 4 metres in front of the player with the ball, should've been a Saints penalty and could've released the pressure much earlier.

 

[STG-Dragon]

Which games would they be?

Manly - when Gasnier & Nightingale were awarded a dubious tries? The same game where Williams is clearly in front of the kicker before he scores and Kite throws a grid iron pass for a try?

Roosters - where Minichello is awarded a try despite knocking it on twice and then Matt Cooper is denied a fair try minutes later?

Titans - where Matt Cooper has a fair try dissallowed in a game we lost by a point at the death of extra time. Where we had a player spear tackled and should have had a penalty but for some reason all five officials missed it?

Panthers - where we had two fair tries dissallowed in a game we lost 12 -8? One on a call from a touchie 67 metres away that the other three officials were all ok with.

And that's just the last 6 weeks or so.

So true!

 

[STG-Dragon]

Where we had a player spear tackled and should have had a penalty but for some reason all five officials missed it

They didn't miss it mate! They ignored it, because apparently the rules change in golden point! :crazy:

 

[STG-Dragon]

Such gracious winners, if the refs cost the dragons the game i could understand but honestly...

Why should it only matter if you lose a game??? And if it wasn't for the Dragons awesome effort they would have lost the game.

 

[STG-Dragon]

There were a lot of dud calls that went against Saints but the one I can't cope with is the ball that bounced off a Knights player and was caught by another Knight 3m in front of him and they ruled play on rather than a penalty to Saints. It was a massive call at the time and with 4 on ground officials "missing" it, what conclusion could you draw from it other than Saints were being rorted?

Agreed mate!