2017 Judiciary & Match Review

Discussion in 'NRL' started by Timmah, Feb 2, 2017.

  1. Canard

    Canard Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    14,444
    Likes Received:
    756
    Could Souffs get any more Leg ups.
     
  2. Rabbits20

    Rabbits20 Referee

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    26,022
    Likes Received:
    946
    Troll.
     
  3. mave

    mave Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,041
    Likes Received:
    356
    Could these fkers at the NRL be any less consistent with these judiciary charges ?

    Im completely not suprised Burgess got off, considering his name and who he plays for.
     
  4. Canard

    Canard Coach

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2005
    Messages:
    14,444
    Likes Received:
    756
    It's always depends on the colour of jersey.
     
  5. East Coast Tiger

    East Coast Tiger Coach

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    12,822
    Likes Received:
    852
    Even their own judiciary has no respect for the NRL admin and the match review committee. Sack them all.
     
  6. Timmah

    Timmah LeagueUnlimited News Editor Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    93,415
    Likes Received:
    400
    Wait on, a system designed to weigh the checks and balances should result in the MRC being sacked because of one particular finding that went against what they'd said?

    What an awful analysis of the system lol
     
  7. East Coast Tiger

    East Coast Tiger Coach

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    12,822
    Likes Received:
    852
    It proves their charge was wrong. And it's not the first time, as anyone who actually knows the game would know.

    If the player hadn't fought it, as he is discouraged from doing, an incompetent decision would have been upheld without any challenge, as many many incompetent decisions are.

    We never know just how often the MRC get it wrong because the system ensures they are rarely scrutinised. That's your f**king "system". Is it a hard on for Greenberg or the fact it happened against the Bulldogs that hurts the most?
     
  8. yobbo84

    yobbo84 Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,449
    Likes Received:
    104
    Right decision, it wasn't a shoulder charge.

    Thank goodness the judiciary panel last night was three former forwards!

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Rabbits20

    Rabbits20 Referee

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2014
    Messages:
    26,022
    Likes Received:
    946
    Correctamundo.
     
  10. big hit!

    big hit! Juniors

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2012
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    60
    big ups to kasey badger being in position/keeping up with play and ruling on two forward passes in the parra vs wests match on monday. proving that if proper touchies are selected rather than the usual old farts with shorts pulled up to their nipples, the extra two officials can actually contribute to the officiating of a match rather than just be glorified flag waivers for obvious outcomes like conversions and when the ball is out of play.
     
  11. mave

    mave Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,041
    Likes Received:
    356

    Sort of reminds me of another tackle in Round 1 that a player missed 2 weeks for
     
  12. coolsteve

    coolsteve Juniors

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    878
    Likes Received:
    60
    just goes to show that you dont shoulder charge for the first few weeks and let the hysteria settle down. open slather , now
     
    mave likes this.
  13. skeepe

    skeepe Immortal

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    30,546
    Likes Received:
    457
    How many weeks for Dylan Walker's head slam on Sezer? It would have to be at least two you would think.
     
  14. mave

    mave Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,041
    Likes Received:
    356
    If Burgess does it = zero weeks.

    Walker ( Manly loading) = 2 weeks.

    Normal human watching NRL = what head slam ? I must have missed it.
     
  15. Nice Beaver

    Nice Beaver Bench

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    4,806
    Likes Received:
    702
    Zero weeks. Maybe a statue next to Mal's.

    What ya reckon??
     
  16. nick87

    nick87 First Grade

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2014
    Messages:
    7,313
    Likes Received:
    218
    Nothing in it. I wouldnt even cite him. Penalty was sufficient, if not a touch OTT
     
    Pedge1971 likes this.
  17. lockyno1

    lockyno1 Immortal

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Messages:
    43,651
    Likes Received:
    139
    Burgess should get a month for that shoulder charge
     
  18. SBD82

    SBD82 Juniors

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,740
    Likes Received:
    897
    Should. But won't.

    Honestly, how ridiculous would it be to be suspended after he wasn't suspended for elbowing.
     
  19. yobbo84

    yobbo84 Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,449
    Likes Received:
    104
    He got 4 weeks, grade 2 shoulder charge.
     
  20. yobbo84

    yobbo84 Bench

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,449
    Likes Received:
    104
    Honestly I still can't believe rugby league has reached a point where we're suspending players for tackles to the body.
     

Share This Page