What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

BBL's $33 million loss

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,013
^^^^

THE Australian Cricketers Association has called for an independent investigation after the Herald Sun reported the Big Bash had made a $33 million loss over the first five years of competition.

Despite being a runaway hit, the Twenty20 competition needed massive upfront investment from Cricket Australia and suffered from underselling its initial TV deal as the BBL tried to make its mark on the Australian summer.

The massive loss was a result of CA spending $187 million to put on the BBL over the first five seasons, yet returns were just $154 million.

A potential tripling of the current $20 million a year TV deal, with broadcast rights up for grabs after this season and highly sought after, could help recoup some of those losses.

SHOCK FIGURE: Big Bash loses $33 million

But the ACA, which has made capping CA expenditure on management costs an element of its proposal for a new Memorandum of Understanding, wants the BBL loss investigated.

“This is either an MOU negotiating tactic or a serious case of mismanagement,” former Test opener and ACA player liaison manager Simon Katich said

“Either way, the public and the players need answers.

“The claims that CA has managed to lose money on the biggest success story in world cricket must be independently investigated.

“Record crowds, record ratings, record sponsorships and merchandising sales each and every year, yet CA are claiming a loss.

“It defies logic and good business sense.”

The ACA has received independent financial predictions which suggest CA could reap more than $2.5 billion in revenue over the next five years.

The union and CA are in a pitched battle over the best way to spend that money on players, grassroots, game investment and management costs.

Katich questioned whether an overspend on management was at play in the BBL loss.

“Is it drained by too much bureaucracy, executive salaries, entitlements and bonuses,” he said.

“One thing is for sure, it’s not drained by either the players or grassroots investments, which together account for less than 30 cents in the dollar.

“I have called for a cap on CA administrative costs before and this is more evidence of the need for that.

“And it is also now clear evidence of the need for an independent investigation.”

Originally published as Furore over Big Bash’s $33m black hole
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
99,885
How much of that loss was in the first season or two? And is it a relevant loss if it sets up a position where you make millions every season from now on?

Gotta spend money to make money....

That said I would also be totally unsurprised if it came down to CA mismanagement. They are useless
 

axl rose

Bench
Messages
4,939
That said I would also be totally unsurprised if it came down to CA mismanagement. They are useless

Agree, they did undersell it. But surely no-one knew it was going to be that popular almost.to the point where fans are pissed that players are playing internationals and not for thier Big Bash team. Crazy.
 

Dogmatix

Juniors
Messages
505
There was a story on Cricinfo last summer saying that Cricket Australia were making some incredible loss on the tours of South Africa and Pakistan to Australia last year. The loss was something like -$60 million or -$70 million

The thing is Cricket Australia makes a killing out of tours involving India. So they make a billion or half a billion out of Indian tours so sets the price I guess for hiring the SCG/MCG etc etc. The result is they make a fortune out of Indian tours but every other tour makes a big loss except maybe the Ashes (even the Ashes might make a loss)

The BBL would make a loss for the same reason

If India stopped playing cricket then everything would change and then I would guess the BBL would be their biggest money maker along with the Ashes

Cricket Australia have a massive profit 1 year in 4 when India tours and post massive losses 3 years out of 4 but overall make a profit across the 4 years
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
148,901
I like how the lump in the whole 5 years and say it's a 33m loss, how much of that was the first two years??? Of course there will be losses setting up a new comp. How much has been lost the last 2 years??? Especially when you add in the rights tripling, this is just another excuse so the players look bad asking for more money.
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
66,238
well thats it then

play india ever 2 years here and a croquet competition the other years
 

Latest posts

Top