If indeed the agreement was "a joke" as you say, how is it that Abbott could be "100% correct", when in making that statement, he need acknowledge that by your own measure, he was initially 100% incorrect in his support in the first place? Here's the thing, if Abbott truly gave a f**k, he'd work towards a solution that was long term ( or even medium term ) politically sustainable. Yet instead he seeks only to undermine that which is presented or adopted to satisfy whatever urge he may have at any particular time. Regardless of where one stands in the energy debate, the one thing that stands out as the major hurdle to workable solutions is the complete lack of surety when it comes to policy under which large, long term investment decisions need be made, and it is beyond any doubt that your man here is the major contributor to that. He should simply f**k off and disappear into the nether regions from whence he came.