What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Interesting very interesting

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
There's literally nothing tangible actually said in that article.
Pure posturing.
The NRL could say "We'll be bigger than the NFL" tomorrow but it would be baseless lunacy without any visible plan
 

Evil Homer

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
7,178
There's literally nothing tangible actually said in that article.
Pure posturing.
The NRL could say "We'll be bigger than the NFL" tomorrow but it would be baseless lunacy without any visible plan
It's the same journalist who pumped out most of the New York stuff, a total fantasist.
 
Messages
14,220
There's literally nothing tangible actually said in that article.
Pure posturing.
The NRL could say "We'll be bigger than the NFL" tomorrow but it would be baseless lunacy without any visible plan
Has Rugby League ever had a plan or has it always been a policy on the hoof game?
Off the top of my head i can't think if we've even had a 5 year plan anywhere on clubs or internationals.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
It's the same journalist who pumped out most of the New York stuff, a total fantasist.

Obviously clubs are gonna say things will be better now that we're in charge.
But in 18 months when they have the same sponsors, same competition format, same broadcast deals, same complaints then we'll see if they're still talking big game.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,925
RFL reminds me of NRL pre Commission days. No annual report, no strategic plan, conflicted ownership and decision making. It needs some professionalism and vision bringing to it and quickly. Letting the lunatics (the clubs) run the asylum is a sure fire recipe for short sighted disaster.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
Haha I've just said in another thread the lunatics are running the asylum..lol

But it'll get more sinister mark my words

http://www.rugbyleaguehub.com/2018/01/08/super-league-clubs-trying-to-take-over-british-game/

.
BATLEY owner Kevin Nicholas says he has seen correspondence which indicates Super League clubs, led by his Wigan counterpart Ian Lenagan, are trying to take over the running of the sport in Britain.



Speaking in this morning’s League Weekly, Nicholas says he believe Super League clubs want to reduce teams in all other divisions to ranks of amateurs, using a power vacuum created by the departure from the Rugby Football League of chief executive Nigel Wood.

“I was able to see a letter from October 7 that Ian Lenagan sent to all Super League clubs, some of it expressing reasonable criticism of the RFL , making it clear that Super League should be making all the decisions on where all the (TV money) goes, and should have complete control – not the independent RFL board,” Nicholas told the magazine.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,925
Nothing new, they've been trying since 1996! Seems this time they might succeed. Clubs outside SL and grassroots will be screwed as the top 14-16 clubs take 80% of the games money and offer little In management of the rest of the sport.

Seems like with the middle 8's and the funding starting to flow to the championship we were heading in a good direction but we will be back to closed shop and no funding below SL very quickly imo
 
Messages
14,220
Nothing new, they've been trying since 1996! Seems this time they might succeed. Clubs outside SL and grassroots will be screwed as the top 14-16 clubs take 80% of the games money and offer little In management of the rest of the sport.

Seems like with the middle 8's and the funding starting to flow to the championship we were heading in a good direction but we will be back to closed shop and no funding below SL very quickly imo
Time will tell, but the super league clubs will still want championship clubs to develop players so that then the super league clubs can pick up the best young talent from the championship
 

deluded pom?

Coach
Messages
10,897
Time will tell, but the super league clubs will still want championship clubs to develop players so that then the super league clubs can pick up the best young talent from the championship
The problem there is that the clubs outside SL will wither on the vine and the game in those towns will slowly die thus reducing the game's footprint and the player production line at the same time. The SL clubs can't or won't pay for a proper reserve grade competition preferring to use the cheaper dual registration option instead.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
The problem there is that the clubs outside SL will wither on the vine and the game in those towns will slowly die thus reducing the game's footprint and the player production line at the same time. The SL clubs can't or won't pay for a proper reserve grade competition preferring to use the cheaper dual registration option instead.

If they take a greater share of the available money they might.
Re-introduce licencing and reserve grade to SL.
Cut funding to Championship and League One pushing them back to amateur status.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
They'll take all the money Adam and spend it on the fairy on the top of the tree (marquee/union players) instead of the grassroots (juniors/reserves)


Ps. I remember Lee briers saying last season that a reserve team would cost warrington £300,000 a year too run...to put that into context last April the RFL & SL clubs agreed to increase the salary cap by £275,000 to £2.1m by 2020 as well as adding a 2nd marquee player...meaning the top clubs could,in theory, be spending upwards of £3m in player wages....

Like I said.. they'll spend the money at the top but not at the bottom
 
Last edited:

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,925
Not really convinced reserve grade is that big an issue now squads aren't huge and partner club agreements seem to work ok. What would be better is a compulsory under 21's or under 23's comp and stronger academies and elite Jnr programs. For a RL jnr hotbed like Hull with 2 SL clubs to only have one academy (even though it is successful to some degree) is outrageous imo.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,955
I don't buy the reserve grade thing either.
The Queensland set up is the most successful in Rugby League and part of its foundations are in a strong 2nd tier comp with dual-registration.

Reserve grade to Super League would decimate the playing quality of the Championship.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
No it wouldn't lol

We had half the Huddersfield u19s come through the Oldham team last year and they looked seriously out of their depth..
 

deluded pom?

Coach
Messages
10,897
Not really convinced reserve grade is that big an issue now squads aren't huge and partner club agreements seem to work ok. What would be better is a compulsory under 21's or under 23's comp and stronger academies and elite Jnr programs. For a RL jnr hotbed like Hull with 2 SL clubs to only have one academy (even though it is successful to some degree) is outrageous imo.
Another myth. Where are all these players in professional RL? Most of the Hull produced players end up at Championship level or lower. Very few make it to SL. One amateur club in Wigan produces more SL players than the whole of Hull does.
 
Top