In Numbers. Not with 42 f**king guns per person. And you did say in personal defence as you went on about home invasions dumbarse. So alternate views to yours are satire are they? There is ZERO skill required to shoot a defenceless animal with a weapon that sprays bullets rapidly in the vague direction you point it. It's not sporting in any sense of the definition. If I tied you to a pole a bashed the shit out of your face for a hour, would you call that boxing? would you call it sporting? Of course you f**king wouldn't. So the second amendment allows people to have weapons so that they can overthrow their government, via target shooting and killing deer. That'll teach those beaurocrats. which uses a single shot weapon and a piece of paper. Not an animal. In Australia millions of people have no firearms. We play proper sports, with bats and balls and without the pointless slaughter of animals. I said I'd prefer zero guns. Go find something productive to do with your time than shooting shit. You can play darts which requires more skill than annihilating an animal. I did f**kING SAY THAT. I also said at the start of the post which you clearly didn't read, something along the lines of "if the US Wants to keep its second amendment, then..." I also said in another post "I see no purpose in the existence of guns" Learn to f**king read you dumb merkin.