What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non Footy Chat Thread II

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
The court fined this guy more than it fined Corey Norman...

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...f/news-story/8565e1ee38f2efb6a97e2de8369a49f3

Man appeals after nearly biting another guy’s penis off

Richard Noone, Central Coast Gosford Express Advocate
July 21, 2016 4:35pm

A MAN who nearly bit off another man’s penis during an ugly scrap over a box trailer held on with his teeth until “there was no fight left in him”, a court has heard.

And while it is enough to make men everywhere wince, the melee has left a bad taste in Daniel Arthur Hatton’s mouth after he was convicted and fined $900 for assault occasioning actual bodily harm.


“I’m 100 per cent innocent,” Hatton said from his Narara home the day after he was convicted on Monday in Gosford Local Court and given a good behaviour bond for 18 months.

“I was set upon by four people.”

64f0dc7d5a936cd592878dd55da6b39a


The court was told the 53-year-old went to get an address for a man named Peter Peterson, who he was taking out an apprehended violence order against following a dispute involving Hatton’s son and an alleged stolen box trailer.

“I got near the front of his unit when he came flying out the door (with) two other guys and a woman,” Hatton told police in a recorded interview.

Hatton said Mr Peterson punched him first and the pair ended up on the ground wrestling until the younger man gained ascendancy.

Witnesses told the hearing Mr Peterson ended up “on top throwing punches” with Hatton’s head near his crotch.

“To stop him jumping on me head again, I’ve grabbed a hold of something with me teeth,” Hatton told police.

“And I’ve just held on. I’ve just held on with me teeth ... I held on for another good minute, you know, in that position. Then people, I think he, he just started going slumping out, ... there was no fight left in him.”


Ronald Crowther said he had been with Mr Peterson and Shantelle White earlier and said after the fight he turned around to see “Pete’s jeans in his mouth”.

Photographs of Mr Peterson’s denim shorts showing the patch ripped out in the eye-watering exchange were tendered in court along with a picture of his penis showing a large 5cm laceration to the underside.

62ee4a608df6ecced3dd716fe1034bc0
384500c4dd7c90b9210d98400a9a4de8


Hatton left the Wyoming address about 10am on September 22 last year and reported it to police, who tracked Mr Peterson down at Gosford Hospital.

“I saw a male within the foyer area holding a bandage to his crotch,” Senior- Constable Daniel McArthur said in his statement. “He said ‘I’ve been bitten’. I said ‘bitten? Where?’ I saw he looked down at his crotch. I said ‘on the dick?’ He said ‘yeah’.”

Hatton told police he was “half the size and twice the age” of Mr Peterson and when he was shown a picture of the man’s wounded manhood and asked if he knew how it happened, he said “no idea mate”.

“I suspect it was when I bit his leg to stop him jumping onto me head again,” he said. “Well, I didn’t knowingly bite him on the penis, you know, I’m not like that mate, you know.

“Like I say, I was fighting for my life at the time. My head was bouncing off the concrete like a pinball.”

At his home on Tuesday Hatton maintained his innocence, blaming his ex-wife’s testimony — which contradicted his — and his honesty when first interviewed by police for losing his case.

“My own missus, my ex hammered me,” he said.

“Let this be a lesson to everybody, don’t ever trust the police and don’t tell them anything.” .


Hatton has appealed his conviction in the District Court.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
74,075
I bet you never thought that Former NSW Premier Neville Wran's family and the Eels have anything in common.

Harriet Wran subjected to 'immense' distress by ill-informed News Corp attacks, says judge
Judge says News Corp Australia’s Sydney newspapers’ reporting a mitigating factor in sentencing her


Harriet Wran has been subjected to a “sustained and unpleasant campaign” by the Daily Telegraph and the Sunday Telegraph causing her “immense psychological distress” and humiliation, Justice Ian Harrison said in handing down her sentence.

Wran was handed a four-year prison term for robbery in company and a one-year jail term for acting as an accessory after the fact to the murder of the Redfern drug dealer Daniel McNulty.

Harrison gave her a two-year non-parole period for the robbery offence, meaning that, with time already served, Wran will be eligible for release on 12 August.

Harrison used his sentencing remarks to criticise the coverage of the case in the Sydney tabloids, citing headlines in the Daily Telegraph such as “DIRTY HARRIET” and “Revealed: Wran’s role in ice junkies’ plot to murder a drug dealer”. Harrison said the headlines incorrectly implied that Wran had willingly taken part in a planned murder and made her a potential target in a dangerous environment.

The “ill-informed” reporting of the News Corp Australia’s Sydney newspapers was so damaging to Wran, who was forced into protective custody for 12 months, it was a mitigating factor in sentencing the daughter of the former Labor premier Neville Wran.

“In my opinion the publication of these egregious articles warrants the imposition of a sentence that takes account of Ms Wran’s continuing exposure to the risk of custodial retribution, the unavoidable spectre of enduring damage to her reputation and an impeded recovery from her ongoing mental health and drug-related problems,” he said.

In his remarks Harrison said Wran had been placed in maximum security for her own safety rather than for behavioural or disciplinary reasons.

“She has been the target of threats and unpleasant attention from other prisoners,” he said. “Ms Wran was placed in a harsh custodial environment because of her unwanted and unsolicited public profile.

“Apart from the uncontrollable accident of her birth, Ms Wran has done nothing to place herself in the public eye.

“Ms Wran’s privacy, and that of her family, has also been grossly invaded. Family photos have been republished. Ms Wran’s private correspondence has been extracted for prurient consumption. Even her distraught telephone calls to her mother have been transcribed and, in an extraordinary step, re-enacted for listeners to consume online.

“The articles make allegations about her criminality, sexual conduct and reputation that have no basis in fact but from which she has no ability to defend herself.”

Harrison said the “extra-curial punishment” Wran had been subjected to included the implication that she had received special treatment because of her family connections and the publication of private correspondence and family photographs. Misleading headlines such as “Plea to escape murder trial: Harriet’s secret bid to cut a deal” and “Nev’s daughter seeks get-out-of-jail deal in drug murder case” gave the unfair impression she had been treated differently to other people on trial.

One article, “How I Ended Up in Hell”, included lengthy extracts from letters and included details of her daily prison life, her interactions with other inmates and her observations about warders. “Its publication exposed Ms Wran to unwelcome attention from inmates and some prison staff,” Harrison said.

The allegation in “Sex, drug binge after murder” that Wran had loud sex after the murder “has not been advanced by the crown and has been vehemently denied by Ms Wran”, he said.

Harrison also singled out the Sydney Morning Herald and the Daily Mail for picking up the stories and republishing them. “Ms Wran is not able to anticipate when or if this gratuitous campaign will end.”

In a second judgment on Tuesday, Harrison dismissed an application by News Corp Australia for access to Wran’s personal references and the names of people who had supplied them.

Harrison denied the request, citing an earlier case in 2007 when the Telegraph published the names of 59 referees who provided references to a former crown prosecutor who was facing sentence upon charges of possessing child pornography under the headline “Pervert’s legal pals”.

“Secondly, I have no confidence, based upon the newspaper’s past performance, that it will not proceed to treat Mr Wran’s referees in the same unpleasant and misleading fashion in which it has already treated her,” he said. “One could be excused for forming the view that the Daily Telegraph has some form of vendetta against Ms Wran. There is no reason to assume that, if the opportunity arose, her referees might not also soon become victims of the very same campaign.”

In its editorial column on Wednesday, the Daily Telegraph replied: “With the greatest of respect, we would submit that neither the Daily Telegraph nor the Sunday Telegraph has ever been involved in anything as sustained and unpleasant as the murder that left Daniel McNulty dead.

“Judge Harrison accused both papers of running ‘distasteful and wholly misleading headlines’ about Wran during her period of imprisonment. On the latter charge we stand by our reporting and the presentation of our reporting. On the former charge, we do not believe it is the court’s role to consider questions of media taste. That is the public’s role, and they deliver verdicts every day through newspaper sales and website views.”

The editorial went on: “The primary reason Wran was ‘exposed to unwelcome attention from inmates and some prison staff’ was that she had been jailed while awaiting trial over a person’s murder. Any subsequent issues with her imprisonment must be considered relatively trifling compared to that overwhelming central fact.”
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...-by-ill-informed-news-corp-attacks-says-judge
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,626
Well its her own fault ... as i always say, you cant pick your friends, but you can pick your parents

:thinking:
 

Latest posts

Top