Other NRL Games

[Old Timer]

He touches it 1 mt before the white line and it lands almost on the white line.

That's forward.

Refs and bunker say so too.

EOS. (End of Story)

The white one behind him is his own 20m line
So he is running back towards his own line, touches it 1m before his own 20m line it bounces on his own 20m line and that according to you means the ball went forward and then you tell others to go to specsavers
Time for you to put the Ned Kelly armour on.

 

[Gareth67]

Just heard on sports radio that THAT REF from last night has referred Broncos to 11 straight wins at home. (When he has ref'd them they haven't lost.)

And on the road he has 11/13 wins with them.

There needs to be an investigation.

Me thinks that the beggar must have shares in the club ? ?

 

[Brutalitops]

BT....if you look where he first touched it to where it landed, it did go forward.

It looks like backwards as he kept running, but the ball hit the ground in front of the point of contact.

Spec savers tommorrow buddy.

Only if you were referring us I would agree with you.

Lol mate you have it completely backwards. Keep in mind he is running towards his own line, I think you are confused as it seems he is going towards the Dogs line.

Touches about a metre before the white line but lands almost on the line. It travelled closer to the line after he touched it. Backwards

 

[Brutalitops]

BT....if you look where he first touched it to where it landed, it did go forward.

It looks like backwards as he kept running, but the ball hit the ground in front of the point of contact.

Spec savers tommorrow buddy.

Only if you were referring us I would agree with you.

Maybe you should head to OPSM mate

 

[ouryears]

Maybe you should head to OPSM mate

.

In the top shot you will see he is running diagonally, not exactly straight back at his own line.

His hand closest to his try line touches the ball first and then the ball hits his other hand closest to his opponents try line

Therefore, at the first point of contact, the ball was propelled forward.

(From his back hand then onto his other hand closest to his opponents try line, which is in a forward direction)

It doesn't matter that it ended up going backwards towards his own try line.

These are the types of technical points that even got OJ Simpson off lol.

 

[ouryears]

Seriously, Brownie needs to investigate Ken Sio, his knights player.

Last night it looked to me like that was no accidental knock on while scoring... with no one near him.....he rolls the ball out of his arms.

Then the catch the ball and oops I dropped it ....with rabbits then scoring.

Both looked dead set suspicious.

And for anyone who says it never happens, a big BS to you first.

 

[Old Timer]

.

In the top shot you will see he is running diagonally, not exactly straight back at his own line.

His hand closest to his try line touches the ball first and then the ball hits his other hand closest to his opponents try line

Therefore, at the first point of contact, the ball was propelled forward.

(From his back hand then onto his other hand closest to his opponents try line, which is in a forward direction)

It doesn't matter that it ended up going backwards towards his own try line.

These are the types of technical points that even got OJ Simpson off lol.

You obviously have no idea of the rules and have now introduced the useless piece of information that he was running diagonally.
According to your theory, where the ball ended up has no influence, as the fact he hit it forward from 1 hand to the other constitutes a nock on.
If your argument was correct, that the action of going from one hand to the other hand constituted the nock on, then why are players allowed to bobble the ball when they score a try?
Simple it didn't hit the ground or an opposition player in front of them.
From where he originally touched it and where the ball touched the ground (in this case the action that constitutes a nock on or not) the ball was further back towards his own goal line.
Play on every day of the week.
Just as well you weren't OJ's lawyer he would have got the death penalty.

 

[Old Timer]

.

In the top shot you will see he is running diagonally, not exactly straight back at his own line.

His hand closest to his try line touches the ball first and then the ball hits his other hand closest to his opponents try line

Therefore, at the first point of contact, the ball was propelled forward.

(From his back hand then onto his other hand closest to his opponents try line, which is in a forward direction)

It doesn't matter that it ended up going backwards towards his own try line.

These are the types of technical points that even got OJ Simpson off lol.

How did they miss the Goddinet nock on that must have passed you off after your wonderful explanation of the rule?

 

[ouryears]

You obviously have no idea of the rules and have now introduced the useless piece of information that he was running diagonally.
According to your theory, where the ball ended up has no influence, as the fact he hit it forward from 1 hand to the other constitutes a nock on.
If your argument was correct, that the action of going from one hand to the other hand constituted the nock on, then why are players allowed to bobble the ball when they score a try?
Simple it didn't hit the ground or an opposition player in front of them.
From where he originally touched it and where the ball touched the ground (in this case the action that constitutes a nock on or not) the ball was further back towards his own goal line.
Play on every day of the week.
Just as well you weren't OJ's lawyer he would have got the death penalty.

Ha ha ha ha but the refs agreed with me you noot

 

[Old Timer]

Ha ha ha ha but the refs agreed with me you noot

Whatever drugs you are on you need to increase the dosage you idiot.
You said it was a knock on so as the refs let it play on how the f**k do you work out they agree with you.
You've pulled yourself so often you've completely lost your mind as well as your eyesight.

 

[Crush]

How bad are the Cowboys?

 

[giboz71]

We should belt both these teams.

 

[OzDragon]

How bad are the Cowboys?

Not competitive enough.

 

[ouryears]

Whatever drugs you are on you need to increase the dosage you idiot.
You said it was a knock on so as the refs let it play on how the f**k do you work out they agree with you.
You've pulled yourself so often you've completely lost your mind as well as your eyesight.

Does your family like you?
Does anyone?
Your mood and language belong in a prison or demented men's home.
Lucky I don't find you and escort you to either.
Your manner of communicating belongs in Hitler's 3rd Reich.

And we all know that final outcome.

 

[Old Timer]

Does your family like you?
Does anyone?
Your mood and language belong in a prison or demented men's home.
Lucky I don't find you and escort you to either.
Your manner of communicating belongs in Hitler's 3rd Reich.

And we all know that final outcome.

Do you still think it was a knock on or are you finally willing to admit your error?
By the way regardless of how tough this place gets there is absolutely no need to resort to the last 2 paragraphs as that is well beyond the pale.

 

[Old Timer]

How bad are the Cowboys?

I agree but they certainly aren’t on their own.
A few teams showing signs of ageing and being sucked into holding onto their good players just that little bit too long.
Lucky for Tigpies because as good as Benji has been going his errors would be very costly against the good sides.
Watching JT reminds a bit of the sadness I felt watching Billy Smith’s career wind down.
The gap between their best and worst widens and the incidents of best lessen.
Very sad to see.

 

[Clifferd]

We should belt both these teams.

I think Tigers at full strength would give saints a run for their money. We’ll see

 

[Bests Golden Boots]

How bad are the Cowboys?

Their forwards are really poor, they got smashed all night by a winger.

 

[ouryears]

Broncs VS Rorters was one awesome game to watch.

Jimmy the Jets try...and Isakas late try were just great to watch.

Staggs debut game...wow.
Just a 19 yr old boy from Wellington.

Can't believe we beat both these teams.

That was one great game!

......Go the Saints!!

 

[2010]

Not often I support the Broncos but glad they beat the Rorters