Panthers v. Heels

[Iamback]

Some abatriy round means nothing

Alone it doesn't

Only 1 team in the last 30 years has won the comp and not been a top 2 defensive team that year.

We have only just started playing the good teams and still have to hit Origin. So it something that needs to get worked on

There is no way a 12 mannned Newcastle gets anywhere near us last year. Lack the Ruthless edge

 

[Iamback]

Interesting comment from Freddy Fittler on Ch 9 - Not a penalty try ever - sin bin yes.

It is how it has been all year.

if players are in front then bin.
Penalty try if it is a kick and no one there

 

[Iamback]

100% penalty try for me

too many unknowns.
Only takes a stray arm to knock the ball out
Assuming he isn't held up that is

 

[Smug Panther]

too many unknowns.
Only takes a stray arm to knock the ball out
Assuming he isn't held up that is

Was consistent with other rulings. That's all we can ask for

 

[panther.mike]

The "bunker" is a negative machine,,,,it only looks to deny,

 

[Iamback]

Was consistent with other rulings. That's all we can ask for

Not in Tigers game the week before.

similar situation was bin and penalty not penalty try.

 

[Smug Panther]

Not in Tigers game the week before.

similar situation was bin and penalty not penalty try.

Maybe the only game I haven't watched this year haha

 

[Iamback]

Maybe the only game I haven't watched this year haha

I don't watch much footy the last month or so. So lucky I caught it

 

[Fangs]

Under the NRL’s operations manual, trainers must not enter the line of sight of a kicker when he is attempting a shot at goal, or do anything that unnecessarily impacts or distracts an opposition player.

While there is no suggestion Murphy acted deliberately, Parramatta are expected to be spoken to about the situation and will likely be handed a breach notice.

“There is a provision in the international laws of the game that allows for another kick if another player tries to distract a kicker,” the NRL’s head of football Graham Annelsey said.

“But there is no reference in there whatsoever if a trainer tries to distract a kicker.

“This is an operational matter, as opposed to an on-field matter.”

...

Asked if there should be a rule which allows players to take kicks again in the event of a trainer distracting them, Annesley said: “It’s one of those things we will review.

“This happens very rarely. But could something be written into our operational procedures to deal with that? Technically, yes it could be.”

NRL confirms ruling on controversial Nathan Cleary kick distraction

The NRL has confirmed Nathan Cleary was not entitled to take a second shot after a Parramatta trainer ran across the goals in Penrith's two-point loss.

7news.com.au

 

[Iamback]

I don't watch much footy the last month or so. So lucky I caught it

Another one in Sharks game.

Was penalty and bin... the correct call instead of penalty try