Discussion in 'Parramatta Eels' started by Gronk, Apr 29, 2015.
Needed 75% to pass? That's worse than a referendum.
The Registered Clubs Act f**ken LOVES a status quo, the merkin of a thing.
It's been done but what the hey...
You can tell Proshenks had a Boner writing that dribble.
Well in true soap opera fashion, there is always an unexpected twist at the end.
Looks like the arch villain has returned and will be involved in the sequal.
Can't believe these muppets still have pawns out there doing their bidding.
Agree. What possible benefit would the NO vote see in having a near 70 year old Fitzy back at the LC ?
My understanding is that Max's appointment is linked to delivering reform, so unless reform is delivered, his work here is not done?
Clearly the constitution must be reformed enough to ensure the problems of the past do not return prior to any election for board members can be held, so would that not then follow that no reform = no elections = no place for any of these shit stains?
Strict? Banning some failed merkins and opening up the potential nomination pool
Sounds like Max can go to the NSW government and get his reforms rammed thought anyway.
Hopefully this is the case, so we can finally f**k the factional muppets off for good.
Thank f**k for that. Looks like we're stuck with each other Max.
Let's be fair. It wasn't really Parra Eels fans that voted this down.
It was old f*ckwits that refuse to let go of the power they wish they had that they'd rather spoil the clubs future than just do what's best for the club and just f*ck off once and for all.
This is the problem with only allowing Leagues Club members to vote on the future of the NRL team.
No. The problem is that you have to turn up to vote. There are thousands of LC members but only 200 odd turned up.
100% Fitzy and Tony Abbott are doing the same thing. They'd rather watch their club (party) wither on the vine, so they can be the White Knight to save them. Delusional.
Why didn't they hold it on game day and allow voting in a tent @ ANZ ?
Why not hold voting over a period of time so that you can lodge your vote when you are next passing the club.
Why not allow postal votes ?
Why not allow on-line voting ?
I guess the answer probably lies somewhere within the Reg'd Clubs Act and our Constitution.
Except I'm not an LC member, because I don't go there.
I'm an Eels member.
Reading this shit f**king infuriates me to no end. I can't believe these people see what good place we are in from top to bottom yet they're agendas are far more important to them.
The selfishness is f**king disgusting it's not surprising considering the the ignorant clowns involved.
I just hope that Donnelly now stays here until we reach a satisfactory level of stability because these halfwits will run us back into the ground.
The place the club is in right now is so so good and enjoyable to watch, a pleasant change for once, yet these clowns don't care about that and would throw it all away to be in a position of power, absolute disgrace.
Separate names with a comma.