hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 148,901
So none at all then???
I really would like some footage, otherwise we would just be guessing like the refs.
So none at all then???
I really would like some footage, otherwise we would just be guessing like the refs.
I didn’t see any evidence of Kaysa getting the ball down.
It’s a bit of a joke really, this place is really going to shit.I just can't believe it hasn't been addressed yet...
Taka certainly didn't
Thought the first 40mins of the season was brilliant.
It does what it is intended to do, which is make a counterattack very difficult. Also a chance of forcing an error, or even resulting in an unforced error. The bomb is the safe option.Yeah I am sick of the constant bombing too. It is so ineffective.
All y'all is the plural of y'all.that one would be wrong
Is she? Not sure I can be bothered to find out for myself. Are there nudes?Am I the only one who clicked on Victoria to see if she is hot?
Tongue out of cheek, that call shat me off.
I'm normally the first to shitcan Taka because he's as dumb as a Raider, but seriously...Taka didn't get the ball down as a direct result of being shoved off the chase by Morris. We should have at least got a penalty and a sin-bin, but nothing.
Lucky we got some sort of justice with the Moses runaway try
Thought the first 40mins of the season was brilliant.
Bunker never cleared the Josh Morris contact which is what is what sent up for, or if they did they didn't directly address it. They cleared there was no contact from Brett Morris but I thought the rule was you can't lead with your feet, which Brett did. There was 2 penalties in that play and we didn't get either, then the refs didn't know what happened when Hayne stripped the ball 1v1 in the ensuing set.
They had absolutely no idea last night, totally incompetent.
Surely there is a third more likely option:The stripping penalties are driving me off the game. I am sick of them.
If a referee awards a penalty for a strip, and the replay shows there was no strip then either
a) The ref is assuming what happened - totally f**king unacceptable for a match official.
b) The ref is a complete cheat - again totally f**king unacceptable for a match official.
It is only one of those two options. The most likely reason is (a)
Are the NRL going to continue to accept referees making assumptions about things they have not seen?? Ludicrous.
You miserable sad sacks. FMD. I’m going to find a happy thread.
Great points.
Pritchard didnt get the ball down.
Even though very frustrating to watch this team perform I'm happy we got 2 points.
The stripping penalties are driving me off the game. I am sick of them.
TBH Hayne probably knocked on - scrum and they get the ball .... but dunno what universe a 1on1 strip ends up a penalty ... not much different outcome tho, they get the ball either wayIt was a terrible interpretation but it is not unusual.
In my opinion the referees should err on the side of the defender in a one on one strip. They should have to be absolutely certain there has been an infringement.
Broadly speaking the game rewards getting tackled way too much. If you get tackled by one guy you should be forced to squeal like a pig for him.