Put up or shut up, ASADA.

Discussion in 'Cronulla Sutherland Sharks' started by The Popper, Apr 7, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Since 73

    Since 73 First Grade

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2006
    Messages:
    7,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    David attenborough says it's over rated
     
  2. newman

    newman First Grade

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,207
    Likes Received:
    0
    You probably forget that most average people are fascinated by what happens behind bars....

    My enduring question is why. Why would you inject red back spiders or vegemite? So strange.
     
  3. Bjorn Pork

    Bjorn Pork Juniors

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2013
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    The suspect on bail still isn't convicted of anything. That has to be proved in a court.

    The prosecution in a criminal matter must prove that the suspect is guilty, not the other way around. Technically that's a burden of proof on the prosecution, which in effect is pretty much a presumption of innocence in favour of the defendant. If the prosecution cannot prove the crime, the suspect is free go to.

    Two government ministers pronounced a guilty verdict on players at that press conference and then it turns out ASADA isn't even ready to lay a charge. A shocking, shocking reversal of the legal process, imo.
     
  4. spirit of league

    spirit of league Bench

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    54
    Thanks BP.. Too lazy to clarify myself
     
  5. coolumsharkie

    coolumsharkie Referee

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    20,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    :?:
     
  6. Coastal Shark

    Coastal Shark Bench

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    3,224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tight seals Coolum.
     
  7. Foz

    Foz Bench

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,715
    Likes Received:
    13
    Dank says he can produce email from WADA confirming anti obesity drug approved AOD 9604.
    Don't think this one effects us but who knows?
    Would make things interesting if its true.
     
  8. shaggs

    shaggs Bench

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Messages:
    4,918
    Likes Received:
    208
    Apparently we won the court injunction against the telegraph publishing the kavanagh report.

    Can't post the link cause im on a phone, but it's from the tele website.

    Not sure how long that will last or whether the tele will appeal etc
     
  9. sharknows

    sharknows Bench

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4
  10. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    30,446
    Likes Received:
    499
  11. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    30,446
    Likes Received:
    499
  12. Eion

    Eion Bench

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2008
    Messages:
    3,482
    Likes Received:
    47
    So the court has confirmed the below SMH article. Namely the little news ltd grubs have read a legal risk assessment which...being what a risk assessment is all about.....no doubt entertained any number of different scenarios. They plucked what they wanted and there you have a front page story. Scum.

    http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/l...429-2io3x.html

    "However, the information that formed the basis of last week's reports was not from the club's internal investigation, the document that has come to be known as the Kavanagh report. Rather, it was taken from the legal-risk assessment undertaken by lawyer Darren Kane of Colin W. Love and Co on behalf of the Sharks. Kane's assessment was not included in the initial report compiled for Kavanagh and submitted to the NRL.

    Kane merely stated that if Mannah – as a member of the 17-man NRL squad for five of Cronulla's matches during the 12-week period from March to May 2011 – had been one of the players who took the supplements the Sharks have been accused of using, and if a subsequent link between those substances and his condition was proven, the legal exposure faced by the club "has the potential to be as serious as matters could get".
     
  13. Madsharkie

    Madsharkie Bench

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    4,290
    Likes Received:
    31
    the cluster f**k continues...
    don't let the truth get in the way of a good story.
     
  14. Vin Fizz

    Vin Fizz Bench

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    2,707
    Likes Received:
    39
    Serious back peddling. They've been sprung and they know it.
     
  15. The Masked Avenger

    The Masked Avenger Juniors

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    1,778
    Likes Received:
    8

    champagne journalism!

    lateshowpic1.jpg
     
  16. Birdee_Num_Num

    Birdee_Num_Num Juniors

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,854
    Likes Received:
    95
    well well well

    what a monumental f**king lie of the highest order

    where is the accountability here, why does no one take these journos to task for the slanderous bullshit they spin?

    heads should roll over this one
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2013
  17. Card Shark

    Card Shark Referee

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    21,732
    Likes Received:
    333
    We have a case for defamation of brand, surely!!
     
  18. coolumsharkie

    coolumsharkie Referee

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    20,038
    Likes Received:
    107
    Mannah's should sue their arse off for pain and suffering. f**king grubs, but I'm not the least bit supprised.
     
  19. carcharias

    carcharias Immortal

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Messages:
    30,446
    Likes Received:
    499
    I heard Rebecca's Wilson saying that stuff.
    Basically she was hinting at it being the sharks fault he died.

    She reckoned it would all be revealed in a week and the club would be all but finished.
     
  20. Miller was a legend

    Miller was a legend Coach

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    10,634
    Likes Received:
    135
    Do these idiots not understand that a risk analysis or profile is about IF's?

    If "A" happens or happened then the risks are in high, mid or low category and within hose categories the possible outcomes are "X", "Y" or "Z".

    This report simply pointed out the potential consequences of the findings in the weird lady's report. What that report claim as being possible or factual is anyone's guess at his stage.

    If Dank is saying he did supply peptides, then what exactly were they? He says none were banned. We're they supplied at the club to all players or to a few may have seen him separately, as has been aledged.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page