- Messages
- 11,706
Good to hear!Connor apparently completed his first skill session today in 2.5 yrs
Good to hear!Connor apparently completed his first skill session today in 2.5 yrs
Maybe part of the problem is that they have two totally different styles of play.
I'm hearing you Rsag85.
I'm a new member as you know, and after my third post the same member has attacked my name, and then his mate likes it. THREE posts in to my LU life!
It's tag team bullying.
No.9 is our biggest problem--both Farah & Cook are NOT the answer for us & we need to be looking out for someone better;much better!!
Robbie is quick between the ears but has become slow of feet;he is past his best!
Cook is quick of feet but he is decidedly slow between the ears--he lacks the guile necessary to be a top player in that position--in this guile area COOK is "thickuss brickuss."
Ideally,a top hooker should be a combo of speed & brains[at the very best that is]----but the No.1 quality is to be quick between the ears ala Cameron Smith!!
Sorry I don't think he's up for it.Get McInnes back
Sorry I don't think he's up for it.
Imo he is an ordinary hooker with deficiencies. He gives slow service!!!!
Cook is much sharper.
Fair enough.Cam McInnes has the goods imo
Any way we have young P.Hunt coming up in the u20s hopefully we can hold onto him and release Farah at the end of the year
I haven't noticed commentators favour cook over farah.
Maybe at the start of the year. But now that cook had his crack and has now lost out to farah again that talk has mostly disappeared. Maybe it's a channel 9 thing ( i watch fox).
I think many like cook for what they think he can be. The problem is he just does not match the hype. When the forwards get going when cook is on many attribute it to him. Yet similarly when they fail to fire he is absolved of blame. Other hookers we've had it's the opposite. When they get a roll on the hooker gets no credit, Yet if the forwards are being bludges it's all the hookers fault. It's because people are trying to project cook on what they want him to be and not being honest what he really is
I'm the opposite.Oh that makes sense I always watch it on channel 9. I tend to hear Andrew johns always having massive wraps on cook. I think you can argue both cook and farah's strengths and flaws all day long but the reality is we have lost Luke, Api and Peats. The insanity of that is beyond me. Then we let go mcinnes as well who the club obviously had a lot of faith in since they let api and Luke go. I would be happy to play Farah at number 9, for 80, in the remaining games that we play where we are still a finals chance. I just can't see why the number 9 is a big problem for us tbh. We went on a winning streak last year when the forwards/halves were firing and we can do the same this year with cook or Farah playing I just want to see us win.
yeah both, but only 1 more year at this stage, and not on much more than the nrl minimum wageWould you offer Cherro or Rochow another deal?
I think the dragons are about to go on a slide down the ladder and I think it'll prove that it's because their halves aren't firing anymore it has nothing to do with their hooker. Cook, mcinnes, Farah they're all no where near as good as Luke in 2014.
They've got knights on the weekend. Probably came at a good timeA slide for the dragons is quite possible, McCrone got hooked on the weekend.
They've got knights on the weekend. Probably came at a good time
They've got knights on the weekend. Probably came at a good time
I'm the opposite.
I'm happy for Cook to play 80.
I don't really care which one plays 80 tbh. I prefer cook yes but either one will do a good job.
Sorry I don't think he's up for it.
Imo he is an ordinary hooker with deficiencies. He gives slow service!!!!
Cook is much sharper.