What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round 5: Rhino's V South Sydney

Dragon Fanatic

Juniors
Messages
1,022
Rhino's Vs Rabbitohs

Game Thread

Please note - This is a game thread only, therefore only game posts can be made here (Teams, Articles). Any other posts will result in loss of points.

Referee: broncoman

**Referee Blows Game On!**

Full Time: Wednesday 2nd July, 2003. 9:00PM AEST
 

ParraMatt

Bench
Messages
3,668
Rhinos Team
1. ParraMatt (c)
2. Gobbso (vc)
3. Eels Dude
4. Parra-Matters
5. ChiaPete
Interchange
6. EWS
7. SomethingWithJohn
Reserves
8. MattKd

Good Luck Bunnies and Good Luck to Us "The Mighty Rhinos"
 

Seano

Juniors
Messages
1,198
South Sydney Team:
1. Seano (c)
2. RedDragon
3. Olympic_park
4. Terracecider
5. Bunny Boy

reserves
rivs
charger/dan
cassie
winglee

good luck to both teams
 

Collateral

Coach
Messages
13,792
Takes a big Shaun Timmins Hit-up for the Rabbitohs :twisted:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

*RedDragon #9 South Sydney Rabbitohs


The Footy Show


There are many NRL fans that hate the Thursday night channel nine footy show. There are even more people that hate Paul ‘Fatty’ Vautin. Yet, why is this show still on the air?
It is loosely based around Rugby League. In fact, most of the show is just humor using Rugby League players or ideas. The brief (very brief) section that actually talks seriously about Rugby League is where the Footy Panel consisting of Fatty, Sterlo, Chief and Matty select who they will think will win the weekends games of rugby league and why they will win it. Again, however, this segment on serious League talk is very brief and is normally right at the tail end of he show.

Running from 9:30pm to 11pm, the show generates very good T.V ratings and the small audience present at the set of the Footy show is always booked-out.
It is more of a “tonight” style comedy show, than a show about Rugby League.
This is why many, many people exclaim that the ‘Footy show’ is a waste of time and should be shut down. They seem frustrated because they want to watch a show about Rugby League, not a comedy with a Rugby League Background. Yet, these people don’t seem to realise that ‘The Sunday Footy Show’, is the show dedicated to hardcore Rugby League facts and figures and other miscellaneous things to do with Rugby League.
Even after ‘The Sunday Footy Show’, there is the show ‘Boot’s and all’, which is dedicated to the memories of the ‘good old days of Rugby League’.
Neither of these shows have much comedy about them and are the shows to watch if you don’t want any humor involved in your Rugby League Lives.

Criticising the Thursday night footy show for not being worth watching is purely your opinion on Comedy shows. But criticising the Footy Show because it has almost nothing to do with Rugby League is an obvious misunderstanding of the facts. The Footy Show never was, has been and probably will never be a serious footy show. The Sunday Footy show is for that. If you don’t like the comic side of Rugby League, then pure and simply don’t watch it.

People that go far enough to say The Footy Show shouldn’t be on the air are also missing more important facts. These being: Many people like a bit of comic relief in their lives and the main point that the Footy Show generates thousands of dollars a year that go towards charities and Junior Rugby League Development.
Segments like ‘Lady Luck’ and ‘Beat the Boys’ are weekly segments that strive to generate money for charities. The is also the new private box in the crowd that a company sponsors for a week and the money goes to a charity or Junior League.
These are just the regular programs that the Footy Show has to raise much needed money for charities and the grass roots of Rugby League. There is also the other things they do such as visits to hospitals and Local Struggling Junior Rugby League clubs. The Footy Show personalities are adored by most kids and are greatly appreciated when hey go out to lend a hand to people in need.
The Footy Show also brings the spotlight to Struggling Country teams and Country Rugby League, often holding clinics in remote towns and/or taking the show out to those areas.

The Footy Show also shows us that players and Media personalities are Human. They do this by putting them in the spotlight and exposing them to funny even hilarious things. The segments like ‘Going, Going Goooorrrnnnee’ and player probe show us more about our favourite Rugby League Players.
We even get an insight on the players personal lives with segments like Ryan Girdler’s ‘Their House’.

Why would you critisise a show that does so much for so many people? Why would anyone want this show to be closed down because of its often heavy comedy or ‘stupid’ comedy?
It is a show that brings so much to so many, and also there is often the thought of “yesss, it’s a Thursday” because the Footy Show is on.

The Footy Show was never supposed to be a serious show about Rugby League and its facts. It is a comedy and a popular one at that.
People that abuse it often do not know the real facts. I have just displayed them for you.

746 Words including Title
 

Seano

Juniors
Messages
1,198
Seano – Captain of the South Sydney Rabbitohs hitting it up like big string

Old Heads

It is well known in Rugby League that a team of young, inexperienced players will not be able to compete on a week by week basis in the NRL competition. The skill and experience of older players have a calming effect on their younger teammates, which in turn gives the side a greater edge. There are many teams within NRL competition which have suffered through the lack of a few experienced “old heads”, while conversely there are also a few sides which have benefited greatly through the addition of these players. Therefore, it is wise for any club to ensure that their current playing roster has a good and even balance between the inexperienced and the experienced.

There is always a case when discussing a topic such as this, that to include a well established first grader, who may command a higher salary, may have a negative effect on the clubs ability to keep other younger players. A younger player on the brink of selection for first grade would be forgiven for being more than a little upset at having an older player added to the squad in his position. However, it can also be said that the added bonus of signing some older talent would be the experience and knowledge which can be passed on to these younger players. For, as has been previously stated, it is imperative that the clubs maintain a good and proper balance.

The main motivation behind an article such as this is to discuss the positives and negative of a club such as the South Sydney Rabbitohs signing some experienced talent for the 2004 NRL competition. It has been reported, both through the media and also through word of mouth, that the South Sydney Rabbitohs will be looking to add some very established talent to their ranks for the 2004 season. While players such as Terry Hill, Jim Dymock, Criag Field, Adam MacDougall and Matt Seers may have been worthwhile additions to any squad up to two or three years ago, their benefit to the squad at this point in time is questionable to say the least.

It is admitted that the players stated above would provide greatly needed experience to a relatively youthful South Sydney first grade squad. It goes without saying that the problems faced by South Sydney throughout the year have been based upon the lack of experience on the field, with some notable exceptions. Players such as Terry Hill, Jim Dymock and Matt Seers may provide the necessary direction that the team requires however, how long would this direction last?

All of the players mentioned above are in their thirties or thereabouts and would not be a long term proposition in any stretch of the imagination. Therefore, it would seem quite silly to replace a younger player with a bright future with an older player who will not fill the position long term. A point in case here is South Sydney junior Nathan Merrit who remains unsigned past 2003. Nathan has been an integral part of South Sydney’s side this year, being one of our better players in a disappointing year. There has been a lot of talk recent about how Nathan is South Sydney through and through and he would never leave the club, however if Nathan knows that those players mentioned above are coming to the club, then that may change his stance somewhat (and explain why he has not re-signed)

As of last year, teams such as North Queensland, and Canberra were considered to be fairly innocuous, with the balance of talent leant towards the inexperienced. However, through aggressive and intelligent recruiting both teams have become prominent forces in this year’s NRL competition. Looking at North Queensland, it was plain to see that the team required a group of experienced players that could lead this young team around the park. Through the signing of players such as Matt Sing, Kevin Campion, and to a lesser extent Paul Rauhihi, the North Queensland Cowboys are now a team to be feared.

Therefore, it is vitally important that teams have the correct mixture of experience and youth when gathering their playing roster. Failure to do so may result in a long and unsuccessful season – there have been many examples where this has been the case. Finally, the most important question which must be answered for a club is would it be wise to sign an excess of experienced talent at the expense of the young up and comer?

750 words including title
 

terracesider

Juniors
Messages
883
Terracesider: SouthSydney Rabbitohs.

The 1914 Great Britain Tour Of Australia.

Since the first Kangaroos came to Great Britain in 1908, tours between the two countries have been a source of intense excitement and sometimes equally intense controversy, none more so than the 1914 Great Britain tour of Australia. This post outlines the main features of that tour: a bitter controversy; one of Rugby League's greatest ever matches; and an ignominious scandal.

According to the original schedule, GB were to play three tests against Australia: the first two at the Sydney Cricket Ground (27th and 29th June) and then, after one test in New Zealand (1st August), the third at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (15th August). The series began unexceptionally, the Lions winning the first test (23-5) and, with an injury-weakened side, losing the second (7-12). Then a controversy broke which is still alive today. For whatever motives, the Australians proposed bringing forward the third test to 4 July, a suggestion agreed to by the Northern Union authorities back in England without consulting the tourists. The British players and management were livid, suspecting the Australians had brought forward the game to take advantage of GB's injury problems: of the players from the first two tests, the tourists had lost two full backs, two wingers, a five-eighth and several forwards.

Despite the tourists' angry protests, the match went ahead. Before the game, an indignant John Clifford ( GB manager) famously addressed his team in their hotel, telling them they would have to play as they never had done before because it was not merely a football match, "... you are playing Right versus Wrong. You will win because you have to win, Don't forget that message from home: England expects every man to do his Duty'. Harold Wagstaffe, the England captain, later recalled that, 'The men in my team were moved. I was impressed and thrilled as never before by a speech. You could see our fellows clinching their fists as Mr Clifford spoke.'

There followed one of the greatest test matches ever played. In what has become known to history as the Rorke?s Drift Test, GB, leading 9-3 after 50 minutes but reduced by injury to 10 men, heroically clung on to win 14-6; but even the scale of their achievement, generously recognised by the crowd and the Australian press, did not lessen the players' feelings of injustice and, through a quirk of fate, opportunity for revenge soon presented itself. The Melbourne test was replaced by an exhibition match between GB and NSW, part of a peculiar, ill-fated plan to unify RL and Aussies Rules Football. However, the English were out for revenge and rather than a display of rugby skills, the Melbourne crowd were treated to a brutal free-for-all, replete with biting. Harold Wagstaffe later held it to be the dirtiest match ever played, a view endorsed by an Australian participant, the great NSW lock Peter Burge. 'I shall never forget,' Wagstaffe recalled, 'the sight of the two packs standing up to each other in some real all-in stuff, with a tremendous crowd cheering like mad because they thought it was all in the game.'

According to the Sportsman, a Sydney newspaper, 'From the outset it was evident there would be more fight than football. Those who love lash were not disappointed and those who love lurid language had a bean feast... the swear stream was strong enough to scorch the grass and set the pavilion afire. [The Referee]...ordered one of the cannibalistically inclined Poms from the field early on but backed down and let him stay. There was lingual lechery as loose in its morals as a vagrant tomcat and supporting the swear words was stoush.'

One Australian (Burge) suffered a broken jaw, another lost a mouthful of flesh out of the back of his neck 'big enough to feed a hungry man' and a third ended the day with a face 'that looked like it had been sandpapered with a curry comb.' After the game, the stoush continued though a drunken evening. As the Sportsman wryly commented, 'Even after the 'game', the two sides cold not bear to be out of each other?s company, and at night-time, outpost skirmishing was in evidence.'

Subsequently, the embarrassed authorities of both countries diplomatically buried these events, and the Battle of Melbourne remained conveniently forgotten until exhumed in 1994 by Ian Heads, the distinguished Rugby League historian and journalist.

Sources:
Rothman?s Rugby League Year Book 1982-83
http://www.rl1895.com/
http://rl1908.com/index.htm

(746 words)
 

Dragon Fanatic

Juniors
Messages
1,022
I am taking over as Referee for this match as Broncoman is unavailable. I will be totally unbiased in my decisions and marking.
 

ozzie

Bench
Messages
4,704
Game over - its 9.00pm and all is well

clock_0.gif
 

Dragon Fanatic

Juniors
Messages
1,022
Results:

South Sydney Rabbitohs:

Red Dragon:
8.1

Good well-rounded article on why the Thursday night “Footy Show” should be kept on the air and really pummels the people that dislike the show.

Seano:

7.9
A good informative piece but at times got a bit biased against the more experienced players.

Terracesider:

9.3
An excellent, greatly factual piece on one of the most infamous series between Australia and Great Britain.

Souths= 25.3 Defeated Rhino's= Forfeit

Player of the match: Terracesider
 

Latest posts

Top