What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Lethal

Juniors
Messages
363
And you're a bitter, hateful, unimaginative little merkin at heart....deadset, the reason bortman wasn't funny is because it was absolutely no different than reading your actual posts. What's the point in making a parody of a parody?

You're a joke mate. A joke without a punchline.

BOOM!
 

RazorRam0n

Juniors
Messages
2,027
I'd say wingers are more important than centres in the modern game. And BA obviously wants to try and recruit Feldt because he's a big, powerful winger who is a beast out of his own end.

so why didn't josh morris stay on the wing?

why
No they're not. That distinction goes to many of your middle forwards.

Some wingers take the most runs of anyone on their team. Even the ones who don't are 80 minute players essential to your edge defence and kick coverage.

Dunno about goal kicking hookers (who is there beside Smith?), but given how important halves are do we want to restrict our recruitment to only those who can kick goals?

Middle forwards like taumololo who will land a 1.2m a season contract ?

Wingers command 500k max
Centres up to 750k now with Dugan as benchmark (jennings rumored to be on this anyway)
Backrowers 700k-800k as we have seen with Merrin watmough episodes
And spine as everyone already knows..

Stop,spinning bs champ
 

RazorRam0n

Juniors
Messages
2,027
Because his game was much more suited to the centres, obviously....
That post wasn't complete got cut off for some reason

Why didn't mick Gordon stay on the wing?
Why didn't gutho stay on the wing?
Why did semi try and move to centres and fb?

It's such an important position remember ?

The answer is the same, all players realize they can't maximise their earnings playing on the wing, because clubs don't value the position
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
99,884
That post wasn't complete got cut off for some reason

Why didn't mick Gordon stay on the wing?
Why didn't gutho stay on the wing?
Why did semi try and move to centres and fb?

It's such an important position remember ?

The answer is the same, all players realize they can't maximise their earnings playing on the wing, because clubs don't value the position

What do any of those players have to do with centres being less important on the field than wingers?

They moved because their games were more suited to other positions. In fact, those are ridiculous examples because the first two players were never wingers in the first place, they were being played there because other players were in their preferred positions.

Semi is still on the wing so supposedly trying to move is a pretty redundant argument. His game is much more suited to the wing, and so he's never moved. Simple. None of this has anything to do with the importance of wingers over centres, by the way. Wingers start the sets and wingers are generally your most potent try scoring options. Wingers are also much more important than centres in defusing attacking raids, especially those that end in a kick. No position is unimportant, but as long as your centre can read in defence and pass and tackle ok, you won't notice if he's a journeyman. You notice a shit winger pretty quickly.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
99,884
Whoa... way to have a meltdown over nothing on a forum!


Another one out of the "over-react to a contrary opinion and play the person first" mould, and discuss the actual issues later - maybe, if we're lucky? :eek:

Lol. Simply calling it as I see it is hardly a meltdown. You twat about, following any poster who dares disagree with your precious anti-Hayne bollocks and being a patronising, sarcastic douche-waffle but the second anyone calls you on it you start going "waahhhh, attacking the man, way to overreact, waaaahhhh". It's quite funny....like, in the way a Trump voter being interviewed about Obamacare is funny. It's sad, it's pathetic, and it's honestly a little bit infuriating, but you can't help but laugh anyway.

I mean, if you were a little bit imaginative, or a little bit unpredictable or funny, it would be quite fun. A bit of mental stimulation, a little difference of opinion and a few meaningless and amusing jabs at each other. Plenty of us here enjoy interactions like that with each other all the time. But you're just so f**king one dimensional and boring....you're like an anti-vaxxer or one of those weird breastfeeding zealots, smug and condescending when you're dishing it out then crying foul when someone dares give it back to you....there is literally zero point ever trying to have a discussion with you.
 
Top