What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

SBS planning to scrap football

Big Sam

First Grade
Messages
8,976
SBS planning to scrap football in shock programming upheaval

March 18, 2015 - 11:00PM
Sebastian Hassett

The spiritual home of football on Australian television, SBS, is in advanced plans to cut ties with the sport as part of a dramatic programming overhaul.

While the decision has not been finalised, Fairfax Media understand the network's content division recently concluded that SBS's 35-year relationship with football – among Australian television's most iconic – should be scaled back dramatically.

The government broadcaster has the rights to show the FIFA World Cup, the UEFA Champions League and one A-League match on free-to-air television each Friday night.

Tentative discussions have been held with other free-to-air broadcasters about offloading their A-League commitments for the next two seasons. SBS and Fox Sports signed a four-year, $160 million agreement to share the rights until 2017. On Wednesday Channel 7 indicated they would be interested in televising Socceroos matches when the current agreement with SBS and Fox Sports runs out in 2017.

However, in what may be seen as a significant step backwards for the game, no broadcaster is likely to show the Friday night match on their primary channel, instead shuffling the match to their digital off-shoots.

After gaining the free-to-air rights to show A-League matches from 2013, SBS surprisingly opted to initially show live games only on SBS 2.

Despite an upgrade to the primary channel this season, the residual impact of the original decision remained, with ratings hovering either side of 100,000 viewers nationally.

The network has also been frustrated by a lack of access to premium games, with primary broadcaster Fox Sports requesting the FFA schedule big matches – like most derbies and traditional clashes – on Saturday nights.

But perhaps most shocking is the thought that the next World Cup may not be on SBS, which has broadcast each tournament since 1990.

The rights are a highly prized asset and SBS could make a huge sum of money by on-selling the broadcast agreement for the 2018 World Cup in Russia and the 2022 World Cup in Qatar.

While rival networks are still considering their options, they have all shown interest in broadcasting football during the past two years.

Fellow government broadcaster ABC took secondary rights to this year's Asian Cup and broadcast all of the Socceroos' matches live.

SBS is undergoing a major shift, triggered by the federal government's decision to cut funding to the ABC and SBS.

SBS is under significant pressure from Canberra to boost ratings and lose its "niche" perception in order to maintain future funding.

Chief content officer Helen Kellie and TV and online content director Marshall Heald are believed to have identified football as an expendable part of the programming schedule.

They recently presented their recommendations – the "project shape" – to the SBS board, who offered a tentative green light. The next few months will be critical in determining how deep the proposed cuts run.

Staff have been widely unimpressed at what they believe is a rapidly morphing culture, described by one member as "increasingly corporate" and "commercial-driven". An unpopular round of redundancies was recently undertaken on the advice of government-hired consultants.

Many inside the organisation believe the SBS company charter, which "sets out the principal functions of SBS and a number of duties it has to fulfil", is being blatantly ignored.

"There is a very fundamental change occurring at SBS. Those in charge at the network have made it clear to everyone they intend on taking a new path," one insider said. "They want to increase ratings by any means and appear prepared to stray from the charter, if necessary.

"If it wasn't for SBS, football would never have found a home on Australian television all those years ago. But those in charge of content have come in from outside and have dismissed its importance."

The rights to broadcast Champions League matches expires in two months and it is believed SBS will make no more than a token bid to secure the rights for the next three years.

Earlier this month, British broadcaster BT Sport paid £900 million (A$1.73 billion) for the next three years of European football's elite league.

In Australia, that leaves ESPN (who have part of the existing rights), Fox Sports and Al-Jazeera's beIN Sport to wrestle over SBS's Champions League share.

Channel Seven recently latched onto the visits of Manchester United, Liverpool and Juventus, while Channel Nine has bought the rights to showcase Tottenham Hotspur's clash with Sydney FC in May.

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/...ock-programming-upheaval-20150318-1m28og.html

Leaving aside the impact domestically which the FFA has been preparing for since the cuts were announced, what do people think about the UCL and WC situation?

The UCL ratings are decent enough for a breakfast timeslot. Could a commercial network pick it up and put it on a secondary channel? Alternatively, it could lead to an ideal viewing situation whereby every match is televised through a joint Fox/ESPN/BeIN combination even when 8 matches are on at the same time.

As for the WC, I believe it's on the anti-siphoning list so it'll get picked up by one of 7/9/10. But what of the coverage/analysis it will receive compared to SBS' coverage?
 

Bulldog Force

Referee
Messages
20,619
This is absolutely SHIT. Having a great sport on live WITHOUT commercials in between goals etc... is great. Why SBS would trash their bread and butter is beyond me!
 

Big Sam

First Grade
Messages
8,976
This is absolutely SHIT. Having a great sport on live WITHOUT commercials in between goals etc... is great. Why SBS would trash their bread and butter is beyond me!

Did you read the article? It's come from the Govt which wants to reduce funding to public broadcasters. People within SBS don't agree with it.
 

Jimbo

Immortal
Messages
40,107
ESPN do a good enough job with the CL, offering two live matches over two channels

You don't have to listen to Craig Foster's inane ramblings either
 

Bulldog Force

Referee
Messages
20,619
Did you read the article? It's come from the Govt which wants to reduce funding to public broadcasters. People within SBS don't agree with it.

I did read the article. I found this particular line is what triggered my comment:

Those in charge at the network have made it clear to everyone they intend on taking a new path.
It doesn't mention that they've been forced to take a new path.
 

Big Sam

First Grade
Messages
8,976
You voted for this government.

Nothing wrong with reducing waste but I'm unconvinced football actually represents as large a part of SBS' expenditure as the Govt claims given Fox produces everything at the ground for the HAL and so do Int'l broadcasters for the UCL and WC. All SBS is paying for in essence are the rights and studio presenters/technicians.

Compare that to their Tour de France coverage where they send an entire team OS for a month.

On the other hand, the fact that it will now be forced to sell the WC and HAL rights to the FTA channels does mean a tidy bit of revenue for the Govt.
 

Jimbo

Immortal
Messages
40,107
On the other hand, the fact that it will now be forced to sell the WC and HAL rights to the FTA channels does mean a tidy bit of revenue for the Govt.

Assuming they don't spend it on Eastern European soft porn
 

Haffa

Guest
Messages
15,939
SBS paying for the A-League is waste.

I know it's not possible but I'd love for Fox to get the WC, their CWC coverage has been fantastic.
 

Big Sam

First Grade
Messages
8,976
SBS paying for the A-League is waste.

I know it's not possible but I'd love for Fox to get the WC, their CWC coverage has been fantastic.

Agree. They've sent their main presenters to the last two WC just to file news reports/do a nightly show. Imagine what they could do with full access to matches/stadia.
 

Mong

Post Whore
Messages
55,684
I like the a league on SBS

Gives non fox subscribers who hadn't tradionally watched football the chance to see it ad free for maximum enjoyment.

Imagine what it would be like on 9 especially if delayed. They make delayed rugby league games unwatchable with ads. A casual observer is unlikely to put up with that.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
150,936
ESPN do a good enough job with the CL, offering two live matches over two channels

You don't have to listen to Craig Foster's inane ramblings either

Not everyone has pay TV, most of the peasants can't afford it so I'm wondering how you will defend uncle Tone on this one Jimbo.

I cant say I'm surprised as the cuts had to affect SBS somehow, this could have a huge affect on the next generation of potential young Aussie footballers if they don't get exposed to a higher level of footy
 

Jimbo

Immortal
Messages
40,107
Not everyone has pay TV, most of the peasants can't afford it so I'm wondering how you will defend uncle Tone on this one Jimbo.

I cant say I'm surprised as the cuts had to affect SBS somehow, this could have a huge affect on the next generation of potential young Aussie footballers if they don't get exposed to a higher level of footy

It is up to SBS themselves to decide where the savings should come from, Nephew Twiz

The 'keep funding us or Peppa Pig gets it' campaign wasn't too convincing either
 

Mong

Post Whore
Messages
55,684
Don't ruin the thread by turning this into a typical jimmy style political shite fight that goes nowhere please Twizzle.

The issue clearly lays with the government reducing funding in the first place along with SBS if they make the decision to cut football.

As football fans we should all be rightly concerned about it whether we have Foxtel or not for football related reasons, not for reasons of attempts at political point scoring and stupid shite about Peppa Pig
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
150,936
It is up to SBS themselves to decide where the savings should come from, Nephew Twiz

The 'keep funding us or Peppa Pig gets it' campaign wasn't too convincing either

Peppa Pig is ABC uncle Jimbo, bit I understand why it may confuse you because they got cut too.

Saying its up to them to decide does not justify the cuts imo, after all its not as though football is a lifestyle choice.
 

Jimbo

Immortal
Messages
40,107
Peppa Pig is ABC uncle Jimbo, bit I understand why it may confuse you because they got cut too.

They are both government owned broadcasters Twiz. And the argument being presented is exactly the same in both cases

Saying its up to them to decide does not justify the cuts imo, after all its not as though football is a lifestyle choice.

Every government-owned entity has been to9ld to tighten its belt Twiz. The ABC and SBS shouldn't be any different

In any case, there is another forum for broader political discourse

The breathtaking hypocrisy of the attention whore pleading for a thread not to be ruined was amusing though
 

Mong

Post Whore
Messages
55,684
Anyhow, the rubbish from jimmy aside.

Any word on the pre season games 7 and 9 have got and if they are being broadcasted live?

Could well be an insight into things to come unfortunately.
 
Top