With all the arguements here about which team/s should be entered into an expanded competition, should we sit back and think about what the purpose of expansion is?
Should it be:
- to enter new markets (in AFL territory) with limited previous exposure to Rugby League? u.t., Perth, Adelaide.
- to regain/shore up support in an area generally supportive of Rugby League but vulnerable to predation from other codes? eg, Central Coast/North Shore.
- to increase coverage in an established Rugby League area?
u.t., Brisbane 2, Western Corridor/Logan
- to enter new areas with no previous experience of top level Rugby League? e.g., Central Queensland.
- to increase the international aspect of Rugby League? u.t., New Zealand 2, PNG.
Perhaps these aren't the only criteria to be used for expansion, and they need not be mutually exclusive, but feel free to add your own. I think if we can determine what the purpose of expansion really is, then it will become much easier to actually select the appropriate candidate/s.
Should it be:
- to enter new markets (in AFL territory) with limited previous exposure to Rugby League? u.t., Perth, Adelaide.
- to regain/shore up support in an area generally supportive of Rugby League but vulnerable to predation from other codes? eg, Central Coast/North Shore.
- to increase coverage in an established Rugby League area?
u.t., Brisbane 2, Western Corridor/Logan
- to enter new areas with no previous experience of top level Rugby League? e.g., Central Queensland.
- to increase the international aspect of Rugby League? u.t., New Zealand 2, PNG.
Perhaps these aren't the only criteria to be used for expansion, and they need not be mutually exclusive, but feel free to add your own. I think if we can determine what the purpose of expansion really is, then it will become much easier to actually select the appropriate candidate/s.