'14 // QF2 // Sun // Storm 4-28 Bulldogs // AAMI

[BranVan3000]

It's just stupid because if they take the tackle and score one play later it's a try. Without video evidence that would be a Dogs knock on 100 times out of 100

But they didn't and we had the chance to review what happened, and it was a knock on. Get over it

 

[MacDougall]

Ffs Fonua just dive on the ball it wasn't even the last tackle.

 

[Martin Bella's Luvhandles]

Brilliant perrett

 

[Glenn]

Why?

Because they make the correct decision.

Because the referee had already ruled on it, calling six to go and let play go on for another 20 passes.
If the referee awarded the try straight off, would you be critical that he missed a knock on that probably wouldn't even be shown in a replay?

 

[Vic Mackey]

Why?

Because they make the correct decision.

I agree in that the refs had made a decision then the ball is passed 5 times on

Play on

 

[_Johnsy]

How isn't that a penalty to dogs

 

[MacDougall]

Piss off Reynolds you sooky bitch.

 

[BunniesMan]

Apparently you can, if it's pretty it should be a try according to some on LU.

I expect that from some on here. But it's sad when big name commentators descend to that crap.

Apparently if it gives Gus an erection it should be a try, whether it is within the rules of rugby league or not.

 

[MacDougall]

How isn't that a penalty to dogs

He wasn't held. He went to play the ball. He got tackled and lost it. Pretty easy call really.

 

[tomdl]

How isn't that a penalty to dogs

Don't think the ref had even called held

 

[Glen]

We should do away with the video ref and just award tries based on whether or not Gus is excited about them

 

[Vic Mackey]

I expect that from some on here. But it's sad when big name commentators descend to that crap.

Apparently if it gives Gus an erection it should be a try, whether it is within the rules of rugby league or not.

If it was against souths you would be blowing up and you know it

 

[Martin Bella's Luvhandles]

f**k me

 

[BunniesMan]

Because the referee had already ruled on it, calling six to go and let play go on for another 20 passes.
If the referee awarded the try straight off, would you be critical that he missed a knock on that probably wouldn't even be shown in a replay?

The ref makes a decision on every possible try. He rules on it by calling try or no try, the video ref is now simply just something that checks whether the ref is right or not. By definition it rules on what the ref has already ruled on.

 

[nick87]

How isn't that a penalty to dogs

tackle wasnt complete, it was play on, Reynolds clearly knocked it on :?

I swear most of LU are still grinding axes against the storm for the SC debacle, seemingly have no ability to be unbiased

 

[Sea_Eagles_Rock]

Because the referee had already ruled on it, calling six to go and let play go on for another 20 passes.
If the referee awarded the try straight off, would you be critical that he missed a knock on that probably wouldn't even be shown in a replay?

Yes. Because every try is checked currently. Why shouldn't that one?

 

[MacDougall]

The Storm centres are having shocking games.

 

[Martin Bella's Luvhandles]

Of coarse it came off Melbourne ray you f**k stick

 

[GongPanther]

LU f**kwits

:shock:

 

[vvvrulz]

Storm aren't out yet, they're fired up big time
Dogs shown they can blow a lead before