If we paid over 200 for champion like Pou suggests than clubs going backwards.
No we're not because we only signed him for a year. The club knew they have money to spend so they spent it on inflated one year contracts in an effort to bring in some leadership and experience. Beau Champion offers that, as do most of our new signings. Next year six of our eight oldest players will be brand new signings.
And besides Watmough, it won't matter if any of them get injured because there are plenty of other options in the squad. It's about diversifying our risk.
Loko was on a reported 300.We are still paying the dogs something next year.So who would you rather? both are injury prone-One is younger and a potential star and game breaker-the other is at best a solid first grader.
I believe Loko was on $300k because he has huge potential and there would have been plenty of interest. This despite him being a defensive liability, and his reported (in the media with quotes from the player and the club) poor attitude.
I do believe most these signings where cause club knew there desperate and have a point to prove.And cheap!
We were certainly desperate but no way were they cheap. We had money to spend and every merkin knew it. And no player wants a one year contract. They want extra money to compensate.