Obscene Assassin
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,664
IMO we only needed 1 of Scott or Watmough... and both have been signed for a year too long. Choc should've been 3 years absolute tops and Scott for 2016 and 2017 only (pretty sure he signed for 3 years didn't he?).
I understand the philosophy behind signing blokes of this calibre - to bring a harder edge and winning attitude to some of our younger blokes but I think the presence of one of them alone should have done the job. We certainly better hope that the change of scenery is what Scott needed to turn his form around, he plodded for most of 2015 when in a Knights jersey...
We had one of either Watmough or Scott this season and whilst it helped we didn't achieve what we could have, whether it be through injuries, lack of experience or something else there was something missing. By now bringing Scott down we have not only strengthened our already strong back-row stocks but we have also made our middle depth stronger as we can move one of Pauli or Moeroa into the middle if need be.
If we didn't sign each of these players for a year too long we potentially don't get them.