What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mad Monday

Xcalibre

Juniors
Messages
2,368
Turned fox sports on this morning and saw the 'breaking news' banner...

Later on 9 it was the top story...

Still wondering what the big deal is, but at least it has created a hilarious fred.

Follow any group of 20 somethings around on a bender and you'd get similar images. Truly laughable that this is supposedly newsworthy.
 

Rhino_NQ

Immortal
Messages
33,045
I’m sure all of the do gooders in shock and awe and demanding that somebody please think of the children wouldn’t see anything like this at their work Xmas parties
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,174
Chris Smith just gave it to the Bulldogs and rugby league in general on 2GB.

A so-called rugby league follower.
 

Frailty

First Grade
Messages
9,299
I have no issue with having expectations of better behaviour, but what I can't stand is the hypocritical nature that these outlets go on about.

The stories of Fittler,Johns, Langer, and Lockyer all give them the branding of 'Larrikins'. They were laughing at Merrin doing a nudie run through a fox sports shoot for the finals promotion.

But then to go hard at this issue is ridiculous. If this behaviour is so awful, then let's not make light of the behaviour of past players and push them as champions and larrikins.
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,874
It doesn’t surprise me that the vote is so one sided. Most people here are so anti-media, especially News Ltd that of course they were going to vote YES.

The problem could have been solved if the Bulldogs put on their idiotic display behind close doors where the media and public most likely would never have heard about it.
Do you fail basic comprehension?

1. This was behind closed doors apart from Montoya passing out outside. The nude photos were taken by a telephoto lens that somehow got vision from level 3. there's no building opposite that hotel which means the photographer was either a long way away or used a scissor lift or climbed a palm tree to get the snaps.

2. When they put it 'behind closed doors' completely six years ago at Belmore, 9 News went further - they planted a journo at the gate to bait players as they entered, used listening devices to record audio, had paps trying to get photos through a side gate, and then when that wasn't enough? PUT A f**kING HELICOPTER OVER THE GROUND.

The problem could be solved by the media not looking for a moral outrage story - especially by putting it front page.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,420
Surely taking a photo of someone without their permission who is naked on a private premises is illegal? Pretty sure Id be arrested if I tried it with the neighbor! Doesn't publishing said photo then fall into porn hate crime category? That player needs to bring charges against the photographer and sue the paper!

Bulldogs where dumb for not hosting the celebrations off the beaten track and somewhere more private if they were going to let their players get that loose. Its not like we didn't know how the scum media would respond.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,420
https://www.bulldogs.com.au/news/2018/09/04/bulldogs-statement-on-team-get-together-on-monday/



Really disappointed with the club's response here. Hope the 'investigation' sends some ire back in the Tele's direction.

Damned if they do, damned if they dont, NRL same, I see Beattie has also expressed his "disappointment". Better if they had come out with a simple statement like:

The NRL is disappointed that one of the so called partners of the game tries so hard to damage it. We would encourage RL fans across the country to consume media from outlets that actually care about RL and dont try to destroy it.

Now that I'd have applauded Toddles for!
 

Springs09

Juniors
Messages
1,903
Disgraceful. The Bulldogs are the first group of men to drink so much alcohol that they vomited and/or passed out. As we've seen with other Mad Mondays and every other boys night out, alcohol is for calmly sipping while playing cards and discussing the stock market.

Nudity is only allowed amongst footballers if it is a harmless joke in front of Fox Sports camera for finals promos, nudity in the company of other men is sinful, these idiots are acting like they get naked in front of each other after every game!
 

Pommy

Coach
Messages
14,657
Who f**king cares? Some young blokes get pissed up, naked and threw up in the street.
The same as any other young bloke with anything about him.
 

Travitoh

First Grade
Messages
5,159
Surely taking a photo of someone without their permission who is naked on a private premises is illegal? Pretty sure Id be arrested if I tried it with the neighbor! Doesn't publishing said photo then fall into porn hate crime category? That player needs to bring charges against the photographer and sue the paper!

Bulldogs where dumb for not hosting the celebrations off the beaten track and somewhere more private if they were going to let their players get that loose. Its not like we didn't know how the scum media would respond.

This is my thinking. The players are off the clock at their end of season drinks. If the story is anything, it is an invasion of privacy.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,270
I used to work in the media (wasn't a journo, but close enough) and this sort of mud-raking bullshit is exactly the reason I left. Largely an industry of parasitic bottom-feeders (not all of them, but a lot) who revel in the misfortune of others and will stop at nothing for a 'story'.

This is never a story if no one's hanging around with cameras. If you're hanging around a site with cameras on the off-chance something will happen, you're not a reporter. Nothing's happening. You're scum. Same as Azzopardi a few years back and any low-life that hangs around an end-of-season party, knowing full well they're there to sniff something out on the off chance it happens. If something illegal kicks off somewhere and you go to report it, fair enough. But this is as low as it gets.

The guy is naked...dunno if anyone else said it but Merrin gets nude for a video and it's all fun and games, yet apparently according to a certain site I read (that I used to work for, and is now as close as bad as it gets) it's 'vile' and 'a black mark' etc. f**k me. It's a guy with his clothes off. Journos don't get that though, by and large, because they've never been part of any sort of frivolity or joking around. No one got hurt, there's no abuse, just a guy with no clothes. Move on.

I was also in media for a bit. I got really quite angry about column inches being devoted to a toxic individual and raised my concerns in an editorial meeting. I was told by the deputy editor that whilst my concerns were noted, the main job of the organisation was to sell a product, not necessarily report what was the best news.

I didn't last much longer in the industry.
 

Stormwarrior82

Juniors
Messages
1,036
No doubt it’s the Nrls fault again?

Going back to the club funding agreement (2.0), I thought there was a clause put in it about bad behavior from players/clubs? Something grant/Greenberg wanted to put in? After the players and clubs wanting to be genuine partners of the game surely there needs to be accountability and punishment to offenders? Surely there is some way to monetize the effect of this mad Monday issue has had on the start of the finals campaign.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4526174/NRL-clubs-400-000-good-behaviour-fund.html
 

horrie hastings

First Grade
Messages
7,289
From that height and distance? Unlikely lol.

The pathway back from the bridge climb goes right near the balcony the Dogs players were on so a very good chance they could seen, I know because I am a regular at the pub and it is fun waiving to the bridge climbers and them waving back when they go past.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top