What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Knock-on Effect NSW Cup - Eels Team

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
84,801
Sam Gormon very underrated. Always gives everything. One of my favourite players. A bit like Damien Cook. Took ages for someone to realise his ability. Sadly such things rarely happen at The Eels. Good luck "bluey".
Everyone knew he could run the ball. It just took him this long to improve his defence in the middle to NRL standard, and he never had the skills for the halves.
 

Obscene Assassin

First Grade
Messages
6,085
Woah he doesn't deserve that ! Who are you the executioner ?

Remember your quote from last week ?

Pot. Kettle. Black.

He doesn't really have the talent or size to play NRL. Probably why he's signed another contract with a reserve grade team. If he was 10cm taller and 15kgs heavier he'd be a fantastic lock.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
73,938
He doesn't really have the talent or size to play NRL. Probably why he's signed another contract with a reserve grade team. If he was 10cm taller and 15kgs heavier he'd be a fantastic lock.

No doubt about it. All the same, he was a good club man and didn’t deserve the “who cares” comment.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
84,801
Of course. But some of us see potential as only a positive and 'double dip' when considering it as a factor to be considered. By this I mean some fans might consider an unproven rookie to be equal to a proven NRL backup, and then prefer the rookie over the backup since his potential makes him a better choice.

But his potential only makes him a theoretically equal choice, and he in fact also has the potential to be a worse player than the proven backup. Given historical trends (the number of promising youngsters who didn't even turn into quality backups) this is actually more likely.

Will Smith has played almost fifty games in the NRL, including four finals matches. He only turns 27 next year, so is at his peak. He is a far better choice to be picked in the NRL than just about anyone who's never played first grade.
 
Messages
42,876
Of course. But some of us see potential as only a positive and 'double dip' when considering it as a factor to be considered. By this I mean some fans might consider an unproven rookie to be equal to a proven NRL backup, and then prefer the rookie over the backup since his potential makes him a better choice.

But his potential only makes him a theoretically equal choice, and he in fact also has the potential to be a worse player than the proven backup. Given historical trends (the number of promising youngsters who didn't even turn into quality backups) this is actually more likely.

Will Smith has played almost fifty games in the NRL, including four finals matches. He only turns 27 next year, so is at his peak. He is a far better choice to be picked in the NRL than just about anyone who's never played first grade.
That's exactly what I'm getting at. Are coaches, even NRL ones, making the same errors the rest of us are? He's very talented but prone to f**k ups.
 
Top