Saxon
Bench
- Messages
- 2,681
As he should be.I think you'll find Billy Slater is a deserved favourite and leader so far
As he should be.I think you'll find Billy Slater is a deserved favourite and leader so far
Evidence
B Hunt 7 points
K Ponga 6
I rest my case
Does the system need an overhaul? IMHO blimmin Fantasy NRL has clearer and fairer scoring models than the 3 point system.
How is Brad Parker not on that list?
Agree this needs an overhaul.
Come on it must be a numerical error...Evidence
B Hunt 7 points
K Ponga 6
I rest my case
Does the system need an overhaul? IMHO blimmin Fantasy NRL has clearer and fairer scoring models than the 3 point system.
That is awesome.With flogs like Justin Hodges judging what do you expect
Ponga by one matty johns c*m shotPonga should win it
Ponga by one matty johns c*m shot
Pearce wins it last season if he doesn’t get injured. He will probably come close to winning it this season too.Well RTS, as good as he is wasn't the best player in the NRL last year, maybe top 5 at a stretch. He cleaned up last season as he was sorrounded by a bunch of nuffies. There were better players who were sharing points with team mates.
It should be awarded to whoever can kill the most zombies in CoD without bashing any innocent women or children for interrupting them
And whilst I prefer the graded every game system, it will still require judges, people would still complain about the scores given.We all know it is crook. Main reason is the judges are either from News Ltd/Fox Sports or Channel 9. They all have a tendency to look at the flashier" players, which is why the players who are up high on the leader board are usually players who play in the spine (i.e. fullback, five eight, halfback and hooker). Also some of them, you do question their judgement or any inherent bias.
Things the criteria is so subjective it can cruel some players. For example, a team can win in 30 margin thumping, yet one judge will give a 1 or 2 point to someone on the losing team, whilst in a similar game another judge will give all the points to players on the same team.
As someone else said, giving ratings to all 17 players on each team, ala Rugby League Week, would be a fairer system.