What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
51,898

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
73,986
Lucky Rudd had so much to spend. I wonder where it all came from.
That's easy. John Howard selling off paddocks of the farm. Howard did not achieve a surplus through good economic management. Gladys is doing the same thing with her poles and wires. Land Titles Office, Sydney Buses and there is now talk about the Eastern Suburbs railway being sold off. Does the sale of assets have merit ? Yes sometimes it does. However let's not pretend that the balance sheet is healthy because of some sort of economic wizardry by the LNP. Howard achieved this by asset sale distortion.

Google found this: Assets sold by the coalition: Jan 1997 – $1.5 million + annual lease payments Avalon Airport Geelong Ltd; May 1997 – $3.337 billion Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth airports; July 1997 – $408 million DASFLEET; April 1988 – $730 million Phase 2 Airports; March 1999 – $650 million National Transmission Network; November 1999 – $347 million ADI Ltd; June 2002 – $4.2 billion Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (plus SACL debt of $1.35 billion); November 1997 – $14.2 billion Telstra 1; October 1999 – $16 billion Telstra 2; November 2006 – $15.4 billion Telstra 3.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
73,986
So you're saying Rudd didn't create all the money he spent?

It was all done with mirrors mate. All of it.

6mh3zJZKHk3kc.gif
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
150,959

Bandwagon

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
41,972
Didnt alot of people claim we were in a good position to handle the GFC compared to other countries because of previous years of surpluses? .... or was that just the same merkins who bang on about surpluses?

Yes, a lot of people have said that, and mostly that's just people who bang on about surpluses.

There is no doubt that having a bit of cash to draw on was helpful, but did it get us through the GFC?

From memory in 2007 we had around 90 billion in cash and around 50 billion in bonds on issue. By the time 2013 rolled around it was zero in cash around 257 billion of bonds on issue.

June 2019 it was around 542 Billion of bonds on issue.

So from that we can see that having that cash in the bank helped, but with nearly half a trillion dollars built up in outstanding bond issues since,June 2007, does it really make any sense to say we couldn't have raised the money through extra bond issues anyway?
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
59,081
That's easy. John Howard selling off paddocks of the farm. Howard did not achieve a surplus through good economic management. Gladys is doing the same thing with her poles and wires. Land Titles Office, Sydney Buses and there is now talk about the Eastern Suburbs railway being sold off. Does the sale of assets have merit ? Yes sometimes it does. However let's not pretend that the balance sheet is healthy because of some sort of economic wizardry by the LNP. Howard achieved this by asset sale distortion.

Google found this: Assets sold by the coalition: Jan 1997 – $1.5 million + annual lease payments Avalon Airport Geelong Ltd; May 1997 – $3.337 billion Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth airports; July 1997 – $408 million DASFLEET; April 1988 – $730 million Phase 2 Airports; March 1999 – $650 million National Transmission Network; November 1999 – $347 million ADI Ltd; June 2002 – $4.2 billion Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (plus SACL debt of $1.35 billion); November 1997 – $14.2 billion Telstra 1; October 1999 – $16 billion Telstra 2; November 2006 – $15.4 billion Telstra 3.


My guess is that if we don't sell things to China in a nice way they'd just come and take it in a nasty way.
They buy all the telecommunications. Power stations are all controlled vie PLC and servers etc. If there was conflict all they do is shut it all down. It is most likely too late to play hard ball with them.
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
28,280
My guess is that if we don't sell things to China in a nice way they'd just come and take it in a nasty way.
They buy all the telecommunications. Power stations are all controlled vie PLC and servers etc. If there was conflict all they do is shut it all down. It is most likely too late to play hard ball with them.
*Vae
 
Top