Arson is predominantly motivated by a) profit and from a mental illness POV b) anger by those who find difficulty expressing this emotion. There is also a cohort of under 16’s who do so via a morbid curiosity. The morbidity does not extend assets or to the death of others. Just trees n shit.You have to ask who benefits most from the fires. Which people are trying to claim them as a victory? Estimates are that 50% of the fires are started by arsonists. Who has the most to gain from this disaster? It's not Big Charcoal that's for f**king sure.
I find this hard to believe.Agree. Throw in some lizard people, World Bank and Clinton pizza child sex trafficking and we have corralled all the merkins in the one place.
View attachment 35131
You think it's implausible?Haha this is a new level of arguing for the shit of it, even for Pou...OMFG
I guess it is possible. Whether it is probable is another story.
It is inevitable.I guess it is possible. Whether it is probable is another story.
Most of life's losers are jumping on the climate emergency bandwagon because they're being fed the idea that climate action will lead to social change.My guess is troubled teens, mentally Ill people and adults who are bored/hate life are the likely culprits.
It's possible some of these people also fall into the climate change category . Especially someone mentally ill experiencing some sort of psychosis. Perhaps thinking he is doing something right.
Most of life's losers are jumping on the climate emergency bandwagon because they're being fed the idea that climate action will lead to social change.
*loosers
Nice pub there OBriens...