Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 84,862
@Avenger is going to go apeshit.Trobojavick (or however you spell it)
@Avenger is going to go apeshit.Trobojavick (or however you spell it)
I would improve the spine so we don't need to be as reliant on Paulo, then I would play him for shorter minutes. While he's on the field though, he would make a lot more carries. Maybe play him in three stints. I would also go with two safe defensive centres rather than requiring strike from either of them. I think we need more speed at fullback as well, just so he can get away from such heavy contact from the kick chase. A surrender tackle is better than being driven back by three middle forwards.What changes would you make if any?
Bevan French maybe?I would improve the spine so we don't need to be as reliant on Paulo, then I would play him for shorter minutes. While he's on the field though, he would make a lot more carries. Maybe play him in three stints. I would also go with two safe defensive centres rather than requiring strike from either of them. I think we need more speed at fullback as well, just so he can get away from such heavy contact from the kick chase. A surrender tackle is better than being driven back by three middle forwards.
Involvement is too low. How about Papenhuyzen?Bevan French maybe?
Why not here?We need a centre and a winger and some kind of x-factor with speed. We have none.
Also which thread do you merkins think I should post our current defence structure? Got some interesting info today.
We are in my opinion the 6th best team in the comp. So far we have over achieved.
Ok. Our current defensive structure / issues:Why not here?
I would improve the spine so we don't need to be as reliant on Paulo, then I would play him for shorter minutes. While he's on the field though, he would make a lot more carries. Maybe play him in three stints. I would also go with two safe defensive centres rather than requiring strike from either of them. I think we need more speed at fullback as well, just so he can get away from such heavy contact from the kick chase. A surrender tackle is better than being driven back by three middle forwards.
Now you're getting greedy mate. Looks like you want to totally stuff our cap.Involvement is too low. How about Papenhuyzen?
Who told you this? A decoy isn't something defenders 'fall for' as though the playmakers aren't making decisions of their own. If they don't 'fall for' a decoy the playmaker will pass it to him and he will stroll through the gap.Ok. Our current defensive structure / issues:
It’s called up and kill (different from up and in / umbrella defence) . But we are too flat. We need more staggering in the line. A flat defensive line gives attackers too much choice and leaves defenders flat footed. Most defensive patterns have some zig zag pattern to it (we currently do not) which can confuse attackers and gives defenders choice on who will cover who. Flat defence works to stop the inside man but doesn’t allow much if they fall for an inside decoy / block runner and then spread it wide which is what keeps happening to us.
I would have patience and spend more money there when it comes available.How would you improve the spine?
I reckon if we let Cooper Cronk go to the Roosters we should be able to fit him in.Now you're getting greedy mate. Looks like you want to totally stuff our cap.
A member of the coaching staff on a rival team.Who told you this? A decoy isn't something defenders 'fall for' as though the playmakers aren't making decisions of their own. If they don't 'fall for' a decoy the playmaker will pass it to him and he will stroll through the gap.
Without naming names, I'm keen to know why you trust this source.
I would have patience and spend more money there when it comes available.