What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Peter V'landys - New NRL/ARLC Chairman

Messages
12,687
Just dense then I presume (in bold for greater effect)
He and Canard are allegedly Cowboys fans. I assume both are from North Queensland and don't have an affirmation for Brisbane. It's not uncommon for people from North Queensland to hate Brisbane. There are strong secessionist sentiments in North Queensland as the locals are sick of their wealth flowing to SEQ.

I've encountered some hostility on this board from North Queenslanders who don't want people from Brisbane to support the Cowboys. It's a really dumb and insular mindset as the Cowboys have a lot of support in SEQ that adds value to their brand.

Lol. Born in Queensland, grew up in Victoria, live in South Australia. Support the Broncos in the NRL and QLD in Origin, and Im apparently a NSWRL fan because I dont support the elimination of teams in Sydney. Get a grip dude.

Born in Queensland but haven't lived in it since 1979.

There's no rational reason for you to defend unviable Sydney clubs and talk down expansion in Adelaide and Perth.

I reckon with his alto ego's you will find he's a season ticket holder of both the Brisbane Broncos and Brisbane Lions and supported a Sydney Team as well in the day.

Is there anything you don't get wrong?

So far you've claimed the Cowboys are owned by News Ltd, even though it's been pointed out to you that the two parties parted ways in 2007.

You think News Ltd is taking money away from Sydney clubs to prop up the Broncos, even though the annual reports from the Broncos prove the club earns more money from gate receipts, sponsorship and corporate hospitality than any team in Sydney, where as the main source of income for the Sydney clubs is the annual grant from the ARLC.

Now you claim I'm a ticketed member of the Broncos and Lions.

😂
 
Messages
12,687
Does Western United ring a bell
The A-League has lost the plot.

Look at their attendances for this season.

ClubAggregateAverage
Sydney FC72,69524,232
Melbourne Victory54,55818,186
Adelaide FC20,68710,344
Western Sydney Wanderers37,5339,383
Newcastle Jets21,3517,117
Wellington Phoenix26,7526,688
Melbourne City19,8806,627
Brisbane Roar26,3526,588
Central Coast Mariners16,7685,589
Macarthur10,2345,117
Western United8,9782,993
Total315,7889,288

 
Last edited:
Messages
12,687
I wouldnt defend unviable ones. But they are all currently viable., and no sign of that changing.
This is bullshit and you know it. Take away the annual grant from the ARLC and gaming machine revenue and many of the Sydney clubs would fold. We saw how desperate V'landys was in 2020 after the season was suspended. At one stage he was publicly begging the NSW Gov for money. Foxtel and Ch9 bent him over a barrel because they know just how much the clubs need their money to stay afloat. These clubs cannot survive without broadcast revenue. Gaming machine revenue is going to dwindle over the upcoming decades, so that makes them even more dependant upon the broadcasters. God help these clubs if gaming machines are banned from licenced venues, which is what the progressives in politics want.
 

mongoose

Coach
Messages
11,324
The A-League has lost the plot.

Look at their attendances for this season.

ClubAggregateAverage
Sydney FC72,69524,232
Melbourne Victory54,55818,186
Adelaide FC20,68710,344
Western Sydney Wanderers37,5339,383
Newcastle Jets21,3517,117
Wellington Phoenix26,7526,688
Melbourne City19,8806,627
Brisbane Roar26,3526,588
Central Coast Mariners16,7685,589
Macarthur10,2345,117
Western United8,9782,993
Total:315,7889,288

LOL such a juggernaut... almost as popular as the Giants
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
2,756
This is bullshit and you know it. Take away the annual grant from the ARLC and gaming machine revenue and many of the Sydney clubs would fold. We saw how desperate V'landys was in 2020 after the season was suspended. At one stage he was publicly begging the NSW Gov for money. Foxtel and Ch9 bent him over a barrel because they know just how much the clubs need their money to stay afloat. These clubs cannot survive without broadcast revenue. Gaming machine revenue is going to dwindle over the upcoming decades, so that makes them even more dependant upon the broadcasters. God help these clubs if gaming machines are banned from licenced venues, which is what the progressives in politics want.

The grant is an ENTITLEMENT for all clubs, its not some optional extra. They are ENTITLED to broadcast revenue as part of their licence agreements.
 
Messages
12,687
The grant is an ENTITLEMENT for all clubs, its not some optional extra. They are ENTITLED to broadcast revenue as part of their licence agreements.
The only difference between now and 1995 is the annual grant back then was just $500k because the broadcast rights were a meagre $10m per annum.

There's no guarantee the broadcasters will keep on paying us a considerable sum of money. We've already seen Foxtel and Ch9 show us just how little they value our game. Ch9 only pay us $115m but were willing to give AwFuL $500m. Foxtel paid the other mob about twice as much as they give us. When they believe they can survive without us they will kick us to the curb. Free TV is a dying medium.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,848
Looks like expansion was on the ARLC's agenda while Peter Beattie was still its chairman in 2019.

Maybe we shouldn't praise V'landys for the Dolphins' inclusion?

What will it take for a Sydney club to consider relocation?
Author
Brad Walter
NRL Senior Reporter
Timestamp
Mon 25 Mar 2019, 06:46 PM
If a team from England is brave enough to relocate to Canada, what will it take for a Sydney club to secure their future by moving to Brisbane or Perth?​
As debate about expansion of the NRL intensified last week, the Rugby Football League revealed they were considering "an application to relocate Hemel Stags" - a London-based League One club - to Ottawa "and another new application to launch a club in New York".​
Such a move would be comparable to the Newtown Jets or North Sydney Bears relocating to New Zealand.​
With Toronto Wolfpack in the third season of their quest for Super League promotion, the RFL could soon have three North American teams if New York are admitted and Wolfpack founder Eric Perez gains approval for the Stags to become Canada's second professional club.​
"Both applications are judged to have the potential to help deliver the RFL's strategic vision," the RFL announced in a statement after a board meeting decided to invite the bids to meet with existing clubs.​
The NRL is currently formulating its strategic vision for the next generation and the ARLC has given chief executive Todd Greenberg until the end of the year to decide what the Telstra Premiership should look like in the future.​
In an extensive interview with Nine's 100% Footy, Greenberg put the expansion issue firmly on the agenda but raised more questions than he could provide answers as the NRL prepares for the most detailed analysis of the game's future footprint ever undertaken.​
It appears certain there will be significant changes and the game will expand into new territory for the first time in 25 years after the current broadcast deal expires in 2022 but before that occurs the NRL must resolve the following key issues:​
How many teams can be sustained;​
What are the best locations for the NRL to have teams, and;​
Which clubs will survive if the competition remains at 16 teams.​
A second Brisbane team is understood to be the preferred option for broadcasters, while last year's NRL.com player poll found Perth was the favoured location among players for the next club, with 27 per cent of the 117 polled across all 16 clubs voting for the WA capital.​
However, there are concerns about the depth of playing talent if the NRL was to expand the competition to 18 teams and much of the debate so far has focused on the relocation of Sydney clubs.​
Former ARL CEO John Quayle told NRL.com last year that the game had been encouraging Sydney clubs to consider relocating to Melbourne as the next step in expansion after the introduction of the Auckland Warriors, North Queensland Cowboys, South Queensland Crushers and Western Reds in 1995.​
However, no club had been prepared to make the move and the Super League war put an end to the discussions as the ARL and News Corp needed teams for their rival competitions.​
Super League model
The initial Super League concept involved the 20 clubs in the 1995 premiership becoming shareholders in 12 privately-owned teams, with four to be based in Sydney, two in Queensland and one each in Newcastle, Canberra, Auckland, Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide.​
The four Sydney teams were:​
Sydney West - Canterbury, Parramatta, Penrith and Wests;​
Sydney North - Manly and North Sydney;​
Sydney South - St George and Cronulla, and;​
Sydney East – Balmain, South Sydney and Sydney Roosters​
After the Super League war, a Selection Criteria was introduced to reduce the number of teams in the newly formed NRL from 22 to 14 by 2000 – a compromise between the 12 team competition that News Corp wanted and the 16 favoured by the ARL .​
The Broncos, Knights and Warriors were guaranteed places in the 14-team competition provided they met a Qualifying Criteria.​
Clubs who merged were also guaranteed a spot but it was specified that there should be no less than six Sydney teams – a move that discouraged three-way mergers such as Cronulla joining with St George and Illawarra.​
Admission criteria
All clubs had to meet a Basic Criteria based on playing facilities, administration, solvency and development.​
To determine which teams survived, clubs were ranked for the 1995, 1996, 1998 and 1999 seasons on:​
  • Home crowds (1. Broncos, 2. Knights, 3. Eels);
  • Away crowds (1. Broncos, 2. Eels. 3. Roosters);
  • Competition points (1. Storm, 2. Broncos, 3. Bulldogs);
  • Gate receipts (1. Broncos, 2. Storm, 3. Knights);
  • Profitability (1. Bulldogs, 2. Panthers, 3. Sharks), and;
  • Sponsorship (1. Knights, 2. Broncos, 3. Cowboys).
Clubs were also required to have a minimum revenue of $8 million per season, including gate receipts of $1.25m and net sponsorship of $2.5m.​
While the three Sydney clubs who had aligned with Super League – Canterbury, Penrith and Cronulla – were considered the most profitable, every non-Sydney club produced larger gate receipts than their Sydney rivals.​
The final rankings were:​
1 Brisbane, 2 Newcastle, 3 Melbourne, 4 Canterbury, 5 Cronulla, 6 Sydney Roosters, 7 Parramatta, 8 North Queensland, 9 Warriors, 10 Canberra, 11 Manly, 12 Penrith, 13 Balmain, 14 North Sydney 15 Western Suburbs, 16 South Sydney.​
St George Illawarra were not included as they had merged at the end of the 1998 season – meaning Norths, Wests and Souths were excluded from the 2000 premiership.​
Mergers and financial incentives
With the NRL offering $8 million to encourage mergers, Balmain and Wests also formed a joint venture, as did Manly and Norths (Northern Eagles), while the Rabbitohs took legal action which led to them being restored to the competition in 2002.​
However, the outcome of an appeal against Souths' win in court gives the NRL the right to exclude clubs in the future and the game may need to go through a similar process if it is decided to keep the number of teams at 16 but revamp the competition from 2023.​
A determining factor could be whether the existing clubs are prepared to split the $208 million they receive in funding from the NRL between 18 teams – a reduction from $13 million each to $11.5 million each.​
While there is resistance in Perth and Brisbane to a relocated team and Sydney clubs are reluctant to move, AFL figures indicate it may be more viable than starting a new team as a Tasmanian consortium was recently advised they would require an initial commitment of $40 million to be considered for entry in 2026.​
The other issue is playing talent for 18 teams and one way to gain an indication of the depth available is to look at the players who were not named among their club's top 17 for last weekend's matches.​
Possible team: Corey Allan (Rabbitohs); Bevan French (Eels), Gerard Beale (Warriors), Zac Lomax (Dragons), George Jennings (Eels); Josh Reynolds (Tigers), Jake Clifford (Cowboys); Tim Grant (Panthers), Reece Robson (Dragons), Leilani Latu (Titans), Rhyse Martin (Bulldogs), Scott Sorensen (Sharks), Nat Butcher (Roosters). Kyle Flanagan (Sharks), Jamie Buhrer (Knights), Lloyd Perrett (Sea Eagles), Chris McQueen (Tigers).​
The views in this article do not necessarily express the opinions of the NRL, ARLC, NRL clubs or state associations.
Beattie was very pro expansion, he literally started his reign saying the nrl needed to expand or it would die. He then commissioned Greenberg to undertake feasibility studies and draw up a plan. We’ll never know if he would have made it happen or not though.

After just a month in the role Beattie gave a passionate presentation of the NRL’s strategic plan for the enxt five years with expansion a key priority alongside participation, stadiums and the women’s game, adamant that growth was integral to future success.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,848
The grant is an ENTITLEMENT for all clubs, its not some optional extra. They are ENTITLED to broadcast revenue as part of their licence agreements.
no problem at all with clubs getting a reasonable cut of the nrls revenue. But it should come with kpis, a perpetual license agreement and be fixed at X% of revenue. And the removal of the clubs ability to remove commissioners. When the nrl has to slash development funding and doesn’t have money to build an asset base because it’s paying clubs overs to make them profitable because they are sht at their business then we have a problem.
 
Messages
12,687
Beattie was very pro expansion, he literally started his reign saying the nrl needed to expand or it would die. He then commissioned Greenberg to undertake feasibility studies and draw up a plan. We’ll never know if he would have made it happen or not though.

After just a month in the role Beattie gave a passionate presentation of the NRL’s strategic plan for the enxt five years with expansion a key priority alongside participation, stadiums and the women’s game, adamant that growth was integral to future success.
I remember Beattie saying that the game will die without expansion.
 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
2,756
But it should come with kpis

No it shouldnt - and it doesnt for AFL clubs either. No clubs, no game. Players and administrators come and go, but the clubs remain.

And the removal of the clubs ability to remove commissioners.

Hell even the AFL clubs can put a vote of no confidence in the leagues commissioners. Its how they removed Terry Oconnor, and pretty much sabotaged Wayne Jackson - both of whom were seen as very pro cutting out the vic teams.

When the nrl has to slash development funding

Did it actually do this though

nrldev.PNG

The fun fact about this is that while the AFL spends more on development according to its line items, that development funding includes its state and affiliate funding - it does not have to fund SA and WA (although they get several million.

When you factor in State/Affliiate and Development funding for the NRL against Game Development, Development Grants and Community Facilities funding for the AFL, the NRL outspent the AFL by just over 50m since 2018.

and doesn’t have money to build an asset base because it’s paying clubs overs to make them profitable because they are sht at their business then we have a problem.

the NRL not having an asset base doesnt have a lot to to do with how much it pays the clubs.
 
Messages
12,687
Lol I’m not a Sydneysider .
doh

apprently anyone who doesn’t go along with the stupidity of you & the other 2 stooges is some Sydney know nothing .
So you're arguing that it's smart to have nine small RL clubs in a city that doesn't have enough RL fans to support them?

😂

I can show you the annual reports to prove these clubs are unsustainable.

Would you like to see them or will that trigger you?

I am challengeling you to provide evidence that Sydney is able to support nine clubs. Broadcast revenue isn't evidence as it's predominantly generated by Brisbane Broncos, Melbourne Storm and North Queensland Cowboys.
 
Messages
12,687
Earlier in this thread I was told by @The_Wookie that there's no evidence of television ratings declining as the season progresses.

I can now prove that he's full of shit as I've got evidence he provided to back up my claim!

Based on data that @The_Wookie provided to PythagoNRL, up to one in five viewers who watch the game on Ch9 at the start of the season aren't watching by the time the season finishes.

Here's what PythagoNRL said:

Generally speaking, PTV loses about 900 viewers per game for each round the season progresses and FTA loses closer to 5,000. That’s about 0.3% and 0.8% of the average audience respectively. In other words, about 20% of the audience that was watching Nine at round 1 has tuned out by round 25 (this only about 8% on Foxtel).

 

The_Wookie

Bench
Messages
2,756
So you're arguing that it's smart to have nine small RL clubs in a city that doesn't have enough RL fans to support them?

😂

the entire premise of this question is rubbish.

I can show you the annual reports to prove these clubs are unsustainable.

You cant, but hell, lets see it.

Would you like to see them or will that trigger you?

It will amuse everyone to see the mental gymnastics you go through to exclude revenue streams they are perfectly entitled to include.

I am challengeling you to provide evidence that Sydney is able to support nine clubs. Broadcast revenue isn't evidence as it's predominantly generated by Brisbane Broncos, Melbourne Storm and North Queensland Cowboys.

f**king lol.


North Queensland were 13th

In Sydney, the NRL averaged 157,000 on 9 for the season with R1s Panthers/SeaEagles the top rating fixture for the season at 249,000.

In Brisbane, the NRL averaged 96,000 on Nine with the highest rating game being R19s Eels/Broncos with 167,000 viewers.
 
Last edited:
Top