hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 157,691
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Not sure what I feel about that. I'd like us to keep him because after a few injuries he was starting to come good and I like the idea of having a fast but big forward who if he gets through the defence, can be 60 metres downfield and looking for Moses, JAC and Simmonson in support.
if he is not medically retired and the player gets paid, the money comes out of the cap. end of story.
Sure ok bro
In order for Burgess to be medically retired by the NRL and have his estimated $1 million-a-season contract declared exempt from the salary cap, the NRL must consider three factors.
www.nrl.com
Wonderful stuff I’m sure but I’m too busy to read it right nowIn order for Burgess to be medically retired by the NRL and have his estimated $1 million-a-season contract declared exempt from the salary cap, the NRL must consider three factors.
Source : NRL.com (but Im sure you know better than them)
- The Player, at the time of termination, was diagnosed as medically unfit to currently continue to train and play elite level contact sport and was medically unable to ever return to play elite level contact sport due to the current level of disability or the significant risk of further disabling injury as a result of playing elite level contract sport.
- The Player, had no similar injury or medical condition to that area of the body that either has or could reasonably be predicted medically to lead to a degenerative condition of that area of the body prior to signing his last NRL contract or if the players contract was signed more than 24 months previous within the last 24 months unless an unrelated single event has resulted in rapid deterioration of this condition.
- A single event that caused the injury could be identified.
How Burgess retirement could open up millions for Souths to spend
South Sydney have already opened discussions with the NRL about their salary cap predicament in the post-Sam Burgess era, and could be armed with close to $4 million to spend over the next four years.
Fair enough, but luckily you have time to share your wisdom with us based on thoughts, feelings and vibe....Im sure Ill pay attention in future.
Given where we are, who you are and the nature of your inputs, I’m sure you will. And I lovingly await your incorrect response
It makes sense. We have a bunch of young forwards coming through and our offer to him would reflect how much we need to keep him, which is not at all. But he's a good depth option at the right price. Obviously he wants more than 'the right price' and who can blame him. He's probably a top 17 player somewhere.
I think Ryles and the club did pretty well to get rid of everyone they did. The one that surprised me was RCG; great call in the end.
www.seaeagles.com.au
Oh cool we’re playing that game. I was busy basting all the people in your life. If I were you probably best to avoid touching them for a few days. Wouldn’t want to mess up that milky sheen.
I hope Footy Dean kills it over there. Was a great reserve halfback.
I reckon there closer to a comp then what Leeds are who have an a-grade clown running the show.
