emjaycee
Coach
- Messages
- 15,164
I actually meant for everyone, so not as obvious as you presumed.Nothing to elaborate. Captain Obvious has covered every variable.![]()
I actually meant for everyone, so not as obvious as you presumed.Nothing to elaborate. Captain Obvious has covered every variable.![]()
Fk Melbourne. If they’ve tampered by approaching him before he’s got a release, I hope they sink for it. Roles reversed I bet we’d get cooked for it.I reckon we stick to what this is about - the release.
we will open up a can of worms if we bring the anti-tampering stuff into it.
FFSThe way I read it is he thinks all 3 parties are going to be in shit.
FFSIf he used the word ‘and’ instead of ‘or’ I agree.
Take a breath and correct your syntax.
problem with that is it means they will miss a hell of a lot of nsw cup and their match fitness will be rubbishSo Papalii has cemented his spot for every team list this season. Probably Samrani too.
Well the correct syntax under the circumstances would’ve been ‘nor’Take a breath and correct your syntax.
I reckon we stick to what this is about - the release.
we will open up a can of worms if we bring the anti-tampering stuff into it.
Not even an inkling... just setting myself up for us somehow getting f**ked over.Elaborate or is it just an inkling? My thoughts on it are it’s winding up for a big rugby league soap opera season finale at NRL HQ.
He never leftWe took bailey back
Plenty of teams already don’t have a utility on the bench. merkins who have utility value are often among the best players, so why stick one on the bench when you might need 80 minutes out of him?Yeah the 2 players that don't get game time basically cant play CUP either that weekend.
I assume there will be some rotation of those players.
I think some teams will make good use of it though the utility on the bench may become a thing of the past and you have dedicated halves and backs sitting there with 4 forwards
Plenty of bad faith smartarse merkins around here. For example, apparently nOtHiNg Is ThE cOaCh’S jOb.I actually meant for everyone, so not as obvious as you presumed.
Plenty of teams already don’t have a utility on the bench. merkins who have utility value are often among the best players, so why stick one on the bench when you might need 80 minutes out of him?
Plenty of bad faith smartarse merkins around here. For example, apparently nOtHiNg Is ThE cOaCh’S jOb.
Taking everything into account at least what’s being speculated in the media, you’d think the NRL will step in and grant us some salary cap dispensation if we genuinely can’t fit him in. I can’t see how the Storm should benefit if it’s clear they’ve breached anti-tampering protocols. They’re a f**king disgrace.
For the sake of you Parra fans, I hope it doesn't go like this:
Judge: Parra, take him back or release him from his non-compete clause.
Parra: we have no cap space left as we have signed a replacement player as Lomax told us he no longer wanted to play in the NRL and was happy to sign the release.
Judge: so do a deal with another NRL club.
Parra: we have tried but will only do it on our terms as Storm is trying to screw us.
Judge: well bad luck, you must release him.
Parra: we have been shafted and screwed.
Lomax joins Storm and kicks the winning field goal against his former team in round 1. Sound familiar?
For the sake of you Parra fans, I hope it doesn't go like this:
Judge: Parra, take him back or release him from his non-compete clause.
Parra: we have no cap space left as we have signed a replacement player as Lomax told us he no longer wanted to play in the NRL and was happy to sign the release.
Judge: so do a deal with another NRL club.
Parra: we have tried but will only do it on our terms as Storm is trying to screw us.
Judge: well bad luck, you must release him.
Parra: we have been shafted and screwed.
Lomax joins Storm and kicks the winning field goal against his former team in round 1. Sound familiar?
