I am not going to be one of those who pile on to the Flanagan's. I really like Shane as a coach and from the outside Kyle appears to be a very decent young man. He is a whole hearted player who gives his all to the team. Simply put, Kyle does not have a skill set that enables him and the team to apply attacking pressure. Like it or not, if you have a #6 or $7 on your back your MAIN goal is to manufacture points for your team. That's the job. The failure to do that applies intense defensive pressure on your team, and the opposition understands that generally 20 points will win the game. I am sick and tired of taking about "brave" efforts. I want blowout wins! That "grinding style" aggregates during the season and fatigues the forwards very early on in the season. We have two young play makers in Read and LKT, and I understand they both have limitations as young play makers but anyone who knows the game knows that these two kids go to the line and ask questions of the opposition defence. Like him or loathe him, Galvin did exactly that yesterday for the Dogs. He caused confusion in our defensive line. Picking Kyle also applies pressure to Atkinson who looks like a running back not an organising back. I would be picking the two kids to run the side, moving Atkinson to centre in place of Suli (who has become a real defensive liability) and while Sloan does my head in he has one thing that the rest of the backline lacks, genuine pace, and I would have him on the wing. I'm OK with Kyle playing off the bench, he can cover multiple positions, but if Shane is determined that "Kyle in the halves" is the hill he is going to die on, then die as our coach he will. We are in the midst of a genuine and sustainable rebuild, and as much as I like Shane, he will be gone if he can not manufacture points, and points manufacture wins!