It’s a hundred million pounds pa
There’s a post by pippen which quotes a pommie journo which says Dazn will offer 100 million pounds pa for the super league tv deal bundled into the nrl deal
Since you’ve probs got him on ignore you’ve missed out an important bit
You guys get half we get half
Each super league club gets 3 million pounds (36 million pa) which leaves 14 million pounds to be split amongst the lower level clubs who will be excluded and the rfl to spend on juniors
Our share would be 50 million pounds which then would mean a tv deal of 800 million pa
And yes I’m sceptical Pvl can get four times your current tv deal with essentially the same content or that your clubs will let the nrl take their 50 million cut given how they view the Australian game
Recent media is saying 250 million pound over 5 years ie $100mill a year
like I said current SL revenue is around $50-60mill. If nrl is going to put in $40-50 million on top then vlad is presumably hoping to recoup some of that through a global tv deal. Probably close to all of it.
but if SL feel they can get an extra 15-20million pounds in the next tv deal anyway then it’s not worth selling ownership to nrl.
we shall see, SL clubs haven’t been given any detail yet from vlad.
WAKEFIELD Trinity owner Matt Ellis claims Super League’s clubs are still in the dark over what a potential deal with the NRL would look like.
Rugbyleaguehub.com Long Reads reported on Monday the Southern Hemisphere competition is pitching to invest £250million over five years in the European league.
But,
speaking on Sky Sports’ The Bench podcast, Ellis insisted the finer details of a potential collaboration are something of a mystery to him and the 13 other Super League club stewards.
“We’re all putting our hard-earned money into the clubs…we’ve all come in and all want to be part of growing the game,” Ellis said. “The NRL, we need to just know the deal, it’s as simple as that – what is the deal?
“[It’s] 100 percent speculation. I’ve been a bit surprised, if I’m honest, that we don’t know a bit more detail about it.
“Of course, if the NRL want to come in here and are willing to put big investment into the
sport, help the owners out a little bit and grow the game, we need to know about it and know what the offer is.”
NRL chairman Peter V’landys met with his RFL counterpart Nigel Wood during last month’s games in Las Vegas, where Hull KR and Leeds Rhinos faced off at Allegiant Stadium ahead of an NRL double-header.
V’landys made it clear they want “complete control” of Super League and made it clear any deal must be concluded by the end of May or it would not happen at all.
Ellis believes anything which means more money for clubs and less requirement for the owners to keep dipping into their own pockets would be warmly received.
However, one of the biggest sticking points is likely to be which teams and how many would be involved in an NRL-run Super League, which expanded to 14 teams for 2026.
“If they want to come into it and inject a lot of cash and grow the sport, and getting the owners’ investment to go down, I don’t see any owner in the room who wouldn’t want that,” Ellis said.
“But we have to know what the deal is and we have to be properly informed as to what’s going on because there’s all the thing of who are the teams?
“We don’t know the teams there would be, how many teams would be in the comp – let’s get it all on the table, be honest, and see what’s best for the game.”
WAKEFIELD Trinity owner Matt Ellis claims Super League's clubs are still in the dark over what a potential deal with the NRL would look like.
www.rugbyleaguehub.com