warriorsownyou
Juniors
- Messages
- 122
Hahaha homosexuality is a genetic flaw. My god there are some nutbags on here. I'm speechless.
And still nothing. Just immature ridicule.
I suggest you take a Science class, darling.
Hahaha homosexuality is a genetic flaw. My god there are some nutbags on here. I'm speechless.
Hahaha homosexuality is a genetic flaw. My god there are some nutbags on here. I'm speechless.
Hahaha homosexuality is a genetic flaw. My god there are some nutbags on here. I'm speechless.
Indeed.
You call some blog from some f**ktard science?
hahahahaha
OMFG people like you crack me up, you wouldn't know science if it bit you on your conspiratorial arse.
If 'living under a rock' means being discerning enough not to believe in whatever horse manure some protagonist shovels onto a blog, and whenever said manure is refuted by actual research, blames a 'government cover up', I'll rest easily under its smooth, cool protection, cheers.
In case you missed the underlying tome of my post, you are a freakin moron my friend. But hey, don't go changin'
Possibly but, like many here who are condemning it, I haven't seen the segment. Te last time I watched TFS Jason Stevens and Matty Johns were doing the gay joke segments.... oddly enough, just like 7 years ago, there was nothing worth reporting or complaining about then.....
But locky it's a BLOG! it must be true! sh*t....did the govt get to u too? They can see everything u know!
Hahaha homosexuality is a genetic flaw. My god there are some nutbags on here. I'm speechless.
But locky it's a BLOG! it must be true! sh*t....did the govt get to u too? They can see everything u know!
Ha. You can shoot the messenger all you like, it doesn't change the fact they're citing scientific facts. Does it?
I suppose one of Britains leading scientists, a reputable Biologist at that doesn't know how to conduct proper scientific testing. He got where he is in life on the back of being a propoganda-merchant.
You silly merkin. Reading is fundamental. What I'm citing are scientific facts. It doesn't matter if they were posted in Zoo Magazine or Science Magazine.
Try again.
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/editorial/feminized-fish
http://www.dailysciencedose.com/category/pollution/
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24768184-5001021,00.html
Some more evidence on the back of reputable SCIENCE.
This is easy. Like holding a midget at arms length. Keep swinging.
I'm not shooting it, I am laughing my arse off at it. They are not citing anything but horse sh*t. What causes gayness (sniggers) is unproven.
Horse sh*t. Yes, that's what it is. The leading biological scientists of the world are full of horse sh*t. They all have an anti-homosexual agenda and shop propoganda to the masses. Because that isn't f**king crazy.
I'm laughing my arse off at the stupidity of you mate. These are not non-factual myths created by deluded blog owners. These are accepted facts in the scientific community.
Blah blah. It isn't proven, and if your reputable scientist has proven it he should go collect his nobel prize.
What noble prize? It's commonly accepted that chemicals and pollution are feminising the male species. There is no noble prize to claim. It's not like the laws of gravity have been redifined. You tit.
It matters as to whether it is factual or not you idiot. A blog isn't peer reviewed and any ignorant c**k smoker can go write any old crap on a blog.
You f**king fool. The blog obviously wasn't the first to publish this story. The blog is citing a story posted by the Mail which is citing Scientific research that is undismissable. The fact you even attempt to dismiss is it is laughable in itself.
Ok, you are really, really, really stupid.
So whats the alarm? More chicks the better!
Whats your problem, aren't you into chicks?
The only conclusion I can draw here is that you're some sort of fundamentalist religious head. Your refusal to accept factual realities is bewildering. I'm guessing you're against Evolution and other scientific laws that can't be refuted.
Keep trying battyboy, every neutral reader knows who's out in front with this debate. Me. The one with evidence and facts for my claims Vs You, the one who can only try and shoot the messengers to save face.
If the blog told you the sky was blue would you argue against it on the basis of it being a blog?
You're a moron of unrivaled proportions.
lockyrulz... I may or may not have the same morals as those I'm accusing of moral crusading... it's actually the crusading that I'm crusading against...... just something in my unbalanced makeup.. I've done many things I didn't really want to do only because I was told not to do it.......
Oh, he makes jokes now. Hardyhar.