Gay rights campaigner loses Footy Show case

[Timmah]

No judgementalism in here I see... :sarcasm:

 

[Pete Cash]

None of those articles really established a link between homosexuality and pollution. They established that there might be a link between pollution and feminisation (lower sperm counts, more girls being born, smaller genitals in male babies effected), but that isn't the same thing as homosexuality.

I mean there have been a lot of gays throughout history. Alexander the great was probably gay and he was hardly a sissy boy or around a lot of man made chemicals.

 

[warriorsownyou]

Ahh dude,

Ahh, don't 'dude' me, please.

You claimed there were more gays due to chemicals, nothing you have posted supports this, nothing.

Right, the feminisation of the male species has nothing to do with homosexuality. Oh my days, were you born this stupid? Or is it something that you've worked on over time.

You claimed the cause of gayness was genetic, you have failed to support this.

You must be f**king dizzy. I've put forward scientific evidence to support homosexuality and the feminization of men is genetic. How have I failed to support my claims?

You're the one posting with nothing behind your opinion, not me.

You argued govermnets were part of some big conspiracy to cover it all up, obviously not doing much of a job if you have all these news articles. Needless to say, you proivded no evidence to support this

I didn't argue it was some big conspiracy. You jumped in with the conspiracy tag not me. What I said was the government and media obviously push a pro-gay agenda. Why wouldn't they? They're not going to shoot themselfs in the foot are they. A few token facts here and there do nothing to change where the government and media sit on the issue.

Bottom line is you are some women/gay hating f**ktard. I am sure there is some research somwhere that correlates women and gay bashing to being a closet homo, maybe you should go read a blog on it somewhere.

Great. I see the rise in homosexuality for what it is and that somehow translates to me hating women?

This just gets better. I'm a female hating anti-semetic tin foil hat wearing nut all because I believe in Science.

What next, do we have anything else to knock off the list? Maybe I could be a KKK member for the next few posts. This is fun.

Again, you have NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. Full of pish mate. I make arguments and form opinions on the back of non-refutable Science and facts. You on the other hand, well, you attack and slander my character.

It's all you can do. Anyone with even an ounce of intelligence can see just how stupid you are.

Wind your neck in.

 

[ramble_on]

But clearly you don't, even if your moral differences only pertain to what should and shouldn't be allowed on tv, it is still a moral differecne however small.

You call it crusading, but in reality it is just a particular moral view that impinges on free speech that you disagree with.

Clearly you don't have a clue... which is why you claim to have all the "correct" answers.... I rarely watch TV so I'm not going to judge what should or shouldn't be on it..... I find far better humour right here in online forums than anything choreographed for television...

 

[warriorsownyou]

None of those articles really established a link between homosexuality and pollution. They established that there might be a link between pollution and feminisation (lower sperm counts, more girls being born, smaller genitals in male babies effected), but that isn't the same thing as homosexuality.

I mean there have been a lot of gays throughout history. Alexander the great was probably gay and he was hardly a sissy boy or around a lot of man made chemicals.

Of course they established a link. There is a direct proven link between feminisation and the increase in pollution and the poison in our foods. There is also a direct proven link between feminisation and homosexuality. Anyone who can count knows that 2 and 2 is 4.

And lets not get it confused, I'm not claiming pollution translated into the creation of gays. Gays have and always will exist. With or without pollution. But that's not the point.

Plenty of people with genetic flaws would exist with or without these added factors. The reality is pollution and the poison in our foods is adding to this, and causing a dramatic increase in said genetic flaws.

That's a given. The real argument is whether it should be viewed as a negative, a gentic flaw(which is what it is), or something completely of the norm. I don't see how any logically minded person could see homosexuality for anything other than a negative. A genetic defect at best.

 

[God-King Dean]

I mean there have been a lot of gays throughout history. Alexander the great was probably gay and he was hardly a sissy boy or around a lot of man made chemicals.

We can thank Christianity for the fear of homosexuals.

 

[Kiki]

I'm used to homophobes quoting the bible to try and justify their hate. 'science'
is a new one.

 

[warriorsownyou]

I'm used to homophobes quoting the bible to try and justify their hate. 'science'
is a new one.

What hate? Again with these rubbish claims. What makes you think i hate gay people?

I view them in the same way I'd view someone with downsyndrome, or a thalidomide for example.

It's pity more than anything. I have no hate for homosexuals. They can't help being genetically flawed.

 

[adamkungl]

What hate? Again with these rubbish claims. What makes you think i hate gay people?

I view them in the same way I'd view someone with downsyndrome, or a thalidomide for example.

It's pity more than anything. I have no hate for homosexuals. They can't help being genetically flawed.

That's a bit odd...pity? I agree that its a genetic flaw, but given it has no effect other than who he or she chooses to root I see no reason to view a homosexual as any different as a person. Comparison with downs syndrome is a bit offputting...

 

[warriorsownyou]

That's a bit odd...pity? I agree that its a genetic flaw, but given it has no effect other than who he or she chooses to root I see no reason to view a homosexual as any different as a person. Comparison with downs syndrome is a bit offputting...

In what way is it off putting?

At the end of the day if you can't reproduce because your sexual orientation deems you attracted to the same sex then yes, that's what I'll give you, pity.

In the same way I'd pity anyone who was unable to reproduce. Why wouldn't i pity them? I don't think there's anything odd about that at all.

Pity;

In regard to humans, a protective or quasi-paternal feeling of pity may be felt towards marginalized or impoverished people such as homeless families; orphans; people with disabilities or terminal illness, and victims of rape and torture.

 

[Kiki]

Something tells me warriorsownyou would fit right into german society in the late 1930s.

 

[warriorsownyou]

Not being able to naturally reproduce is a disability. Thus homosexuality is a disability. That is where I draw my comparisons to Downysndrome from.

 

[warriorsownyou]

Something tells me warriorsownyou would fit right into german society in the late 1930s.

Are you going to say anything productive?

You've done nothing in the way of rebuttling anything I say. You offer nothing to the discussion but slanderous comments and jokes. It's a trait of the common moron. Mocking what you're mentally unable to understand.

Leave the discussions to the grown ups.

 

[Kiki]

What's to rebutt? U are clearly a complete and utter nutcase. I've used this forum long enough to know who to steer clear from. And u are a prime example of that.

 

[warriorsownyou]

What's to rebutt? U are clearly a complete and utter nutcase. I've used this forum long enough to know who to steer clear from. And u are a prime example of that.

Well, judging by your response to my claims there's plenty to rebutt... But the problem is you have no counter arguments, only childish jokes.

You say you know who to steer clear off; But why are you here spouting your immature pish to me?

Your response is geniused. A complete oxymoron. Well done on steering clear of the 'nutcase', oh, wait...

 

[Matt23]

Oh dear, some of the stuff in this thread...

 

[Ron Jeremy]

i havent watched the footy show in ages but theres a disturbing amount of homophobia on these boards and with footy fans in general.

the thing that kills me is, people are watching an all male game...do u think they are all 100% heterosexual? unlikely. odds are most of you have unknowingly cheered on a 'twinkie' more than a few times.

kiki, i totally agree with you, i've even witnessed once a few years a back saying to someone on the panel and i quote 'you nice person', now i'm not gay however i can see where where gay people may be offended, ffs we're all human beings, im not gay, however have a few gay friends who love their footy, and are some of th ebest people in the world.

 

[warriorsownyou]

I'll put it to you like this. If you were born without a dick(clearly you were, you're of the female gender)... If a man was born without a dick, would you not consider that a disability to said man.

Would his inability to reproduce not be viewed by most as a disability? No questions asked, no political correctness, but it would... It'd be seen and the common consenseus would be that he's disabled.

How is that any different than people in same-sex relationships being unable to reproduce.

I just want to know. I want to know what it is about gay people that makes them special to the point being unable to reproduce, something commonly viewed as a disability, is not viewed as such when the persons in question are gay.

Give me a rebuttle. Don't call me a crazed nut. Anwser the question. Explain to me the difference. Enlighten me. You're the sorceror, show me the light. Save this heathen from his evil ways.

 

[adamkungl]

I'll put it to you like this. If you were born without a dick(clearly you were, you're of the female gender)... If a man was born without a dick, would you not consider that a disability to said man.

Would his inability to reproduce not be viewed by most as a disability? No questions asked, no political correctness, but it would... It'd be seen and the common consenseus would be that he's disabled.

How is that any different than people in same-sex relationships being unable to reproduce.

I just want to know. I want to know what it is about gay people that makes them special to the point being unable to reproduce, something commonly viewed as a disability, is not viewed as such when the persons in question are gay.

Give me a rebuttle. Don't call me a crazed nut. Anwser the question. Explain to me the difference. Enlighten me. You're the sorceror, show me the light. Save this heathen from his evil ways.

I don't think gay people need or want pity. Sure they can't reproduce, there are other ways to get children. Homosexuals can still have sex though, something your dickless man can not do.

 

[Ron Jeremy]

I'll put it to you like this. If you were born without a dick(clearly you were, you're of the female gender)... If a man was born without a dick, would you not consider that a disability to said man.

Would his inability to reproduce not be viewed by most as a disability? No questions asked, no political correctness, but it would... It'd be seen and the common consenseus would be that he's disabled.

How is that any different than people in same-sex relationships being unable to reproduce.

I just want to know. I want to know what it is about gay people that makes them special to the point being unable to reproduce, something commonly viewed as a disability, is not viewed as such when the persons in question are gay.

Give me a rebuttle. Don't call me a crazed nut. Anwser the question. Explain to me the difference. Enlighten me. You're the sorceror, show me the light. Save this heathen from his evil ways.

I don't particularly like what they do, however when you have friends who you've known since 3 years old and have shared you've known all your life through school, footy etc and they open up to you and say they're gay? what do you do? you just dont say piss off. The friends who i know who are gay are that ashamed they tried to commit suicide, they hate being who they are, but cant help it, they're just like anyother bloke, love rock, beer, beach....but 1 little difference they arent attracted to women, and from what they've told me it has been that way for as long as they can remember.

We're all human beings after all, and they're litterally a minority group, thats why they're considered somewhat 'special'