Gay rights campaigner loses Footy Show case

[The Tank]

They do...


It comes on right after the League one

Nice :lol:

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Why do you ask?

I am getting an idea or your level of self righteousness & moral crusading.

I have no idea if yo uare femal or male. That itself is a concern.

So I ask, have you ever joined in a bun or been bunned?

 

[lockyrulz]

Clearly you don't have a clue... which is why you claim to have all the "correct" answers.... I rarely watch TV so I'm not going to judge what should or shouldn't be on it..... I find far better humour right here in online forums than anything choreographed for television...

Clearly hey?

But you are judging what should be on it. You are either

a. Judging that everything should be on it, as you disagree with all of what you classify as 'moral crusading'
b. Regard anything discussed by the morla crusaders here as being appropriate for t.v

Either way it is still a moral position, don't lash out at me because you don't have the requisite intellect to work this out for yourself.

 

[millersnose]

Millers is right.Several posters on here do pass moral judgements on people.Some even stoop as low as to call women serial gang bangers based on some media reports that people had said she had engaged in group sex at at least one time.

calling someone who repeatedly gets into gangbangs a serial gangbanger is not a moral judgement

its a statement of fact

if i said she was a low person because she engaged in gangbangs then that would be a moral judgement

if i said she was wrong to do such things or 'she shouldnt do them end of story' that would be a moral judgement

if a woman or a man likes sex with multiple partners then all power to them

i hope this clears your confusion up

 

[sportive cupid]

I am getting an idea or your level of self righteousness & moral crusading.

I have no idea if yo uare femal or male. That itself is a concern.

So I ask, have you ever joined in a bun or been bunned?

Why is that a concern? Are you concerned about what your fantasies are saying about you?:lol:

 

[sportive cupid]

calling someone who repeatedly gets into gangbangs a serial gangbanger is not a moral judgement

its a statement of fact

if i said she was a low person because she engaged in gangbangs then that would be a moral judgement

if i said she was wrong to do such things or 'she shouldnt do them end of story' that would be a moral judgement

if a woman or a man likes sex with multiple partners then all power to them

i hope this clears your confusion up

I see.Gang bang is a neutral word.It is the word that was used by the girl.It is merely a statement of fact.
Okies

 

[millersnose]

yes it is a nuetral phrase

it only upsets people who are morally upset about such things

women who like gangbangs like gang bangs and have no problem calling them gang bangs

 

[lockyrulz]

FFs you can;t even quote properly and you want to tell me about 'science'

Great. I see the rise in homosexuality for what it is and that somehow translates to me hating women?

Actually you still haven't establushed a rise in homosexuality of any significance, nor shown what it is was caused by. At beat you provided some links that were investigating a link between pollution and gender in certain mammals. The rest is a combination of your rampant stupidity and delusions.

This just gets better. I'm a female hating anti-semetic tin foil hat wearing nut all because I believe in Science.

Ok, lets stick with gay hating moronic f**kwit then if you feel it is more apt.

What next, do we have anything else to knock off the list? Maybe I could be a KKK member for the next few posts. This is fun.

Well you do quote from white power websites apparently.

Again, you have NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. Full of pish mate. I make arguments and form opinions on the back of non-refutable Science and facts. You on the other hand, well, you attack and slander my character.

LOL if you knew anything about scince you would know it is all refutable to a degree. You are the one making the laughable claims you cannot substantiate.

It's all you can do. Anyone with even an ounce of intelligence can see just how stupid you are.

Well that rules you out.

Wind your neck in.

Oh god no, having far too much fun ridiculing you.

Now for the bit you were too much of a tard to quote correctly

Ahh, don't 'dude' me, please.

Fine, f**ktard with a small willy, hey you are right, that is catchier!

Right, the feminisation of the male species has nothing to do with homosexuality. Oh my days, were you born this stupid? Or is it something that you've worked on over time.

You haven't substantiated the feminisation of the male species, nor have you established a link between that and homosexuality.

At best, you quoted some articles that had a theory on the effect of gender on pollution. The only moron here is you, who can't fathom the difference.

You must be f**king dizzy. I've put forward scientific evidence to support homosexuality and the feminization of men is genetic. How have I failed to support my claims?

By failing to provide any evidence that homosexuality has a genetic cause.

I didn't argue it was some big conspiracy.

You sure did wacko.

 

[sportive cupid]

Stop it ,you are turning me on.:roll:

 

[millersnose]

Stop it ,you are turning me on.:roll:

it could be it SC

your body and mind may be rebelling against your religious morality

you may well be such a vocal critic of group sex because deep down you find it very appealing

perhaps your continual need to denounce it has more to do with your efforts to convince yourseldf than to convince others

and by the way that is only speculation

no need for litigation

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Why is that a concern? Are you concerned about what your fantasies are saying about you?:lol:

It's a concern about society. Where the 2 become indistinguishable .

Why won't you answer the questions? I can accept if u think its noen of my business.
FTR , yes I have been in buns. Many.

 

[Willow]

Sorry Willow, just noticed you made reference to me...

Well, you're quick. But it really was an afterthought in the post.

but I realized what an idiot you are ages ago

lol. That cuts deeps. I know I get under your skin rambo, but you really are a silly bugga sometimes.

so usually don't bother with the content of anything you have to say......

And yet you replied. lol

Problem is that you didn't even read what was posted, and lame name calling is the best you can manage in reply... which is quite gratifying.

I'm not sure what a goangod is but I'm sure you calling someone that makes you all warm and fuzzy inside... enjoy yourself tiger........

LOL.

Oh dear.. paranoia as well. Geez rambo, you do have a few hangups.

Don't take this the wrong way, but you were not the centrepiece of that post. Sorry if this rattled your cage.

I was obviously answering millers when I said that. Goangod was well known for his homophobic rants in 4C (before your time). I didn't even mention your name until after that.

I do believe I was calling you pompous - because you are. That's something I can't help you with.

But, amidst the paranoia, pretention and primary school put-downs, you missed the real point of relevance to your good self. You see, I stated that it is not you who decides what is litigious - that's a fact, live with it.

Hope that clears things up.

 

[sportive cupid]

it could be it SC

your body and mind may be rebelling against your religious morality

you may well be such a vocal critic of group sex because deep down you find it very appealing

perhaps your continual need to denounce it has more to do with your efforts to convince yourseldf than to convince others

and by the way that is only speculation

no need for litigation

As much as I am flattered by your sweet talk ,I think I will pass on the opportunity today.

 

[sportive cupid]

It's a concern about society. Where the 2 become indistinguishable .

Why won't you answer the questions? I can accept if u think its noen of my business.
FTR , yes I have been in buns. Many.

which question Reefy?
(btw I don't recall you being asked your "bun" status)

Why don't you take a leaf out of your mentor Millsy and wildly speculate as to the reason? It makes for much better reading I think.

 

[millersnose]

As much as I am flattered by your sweet talk ,I think I will pass on the opportunity today.

did you think i was trying to chat you up SC?

did you think i was offering you an opportunity?

 

[blacktip-reefy]

which question Reefy?
(btw I don't recall you being asked your "bun" status)

Why don't you take a leaf out of your mentor Millsy and wildly speculate as to the reason? It makes for much better reading I think.

I just find the sexually repressed, frigid, moral crusaders like yourself are the biggest whingers in society.
I dont go knocking on peoples doors trying to promote or pushing people into bunning, despite it being absolute entertainment at its best.
But moral crusaders & the sexually repressed & the religous, fmd they can't stop trying to enforce their values onto others can they? Why is that?

 

[sportive cupid]

Well you are pretty obvious,Millsy.

 

[lockyrulz]

Out of interest, what is so fun about bunning anyway?

I mean I get more than one chick, (all for that and wish it happened a lot more often) but why the hell would I want to share one with 10 other blokes and have them masturbate around me?

Maybe I am just selfish.

 

[sportive cupid]

I just find the sexually repressed, frigid, moral crusaders like yourself are the biggest whingers in society.
I dont go knocking on peoples doors trying to promote or pushing people into bunning, despite it being absolute entertainment at its best.
But moral crusaders & the sexually repressed & the religous, fmd they can't stop trying to enforce their values onto others can they? Why is that?

I can see where you are coming from. I find it a compulsion of mine to push my religious beliefs on to all that I come in contact with.(Not to mention sexually repression-I am constantly pushing that on everyone)

BTW,can you just reiterate the religious,sexually oppressed view I have been pushing here,just so I know it has gotten through?

 

[blacktip-reefy]

Out of interest, what is so fun about bunning anyway?

you see this ^ &

I mean I get more than one chick, (all for that and wish it happened a lot more often)

This ^, tells me that you don't really ever get more than 1 chick. Nor do you understand the needs of different women at all.

but why the hell would I want to share one with 10 other blokes and have them masturbate around me?

This also tells me you have never been around a group sex situation or your encounters are all at Paddington.

Maybe I am just selfish.

I think you have have explored very little sexually.

The basic mechanics of it means that many women on 1 guy is an absolute rarity & usually on pops up if the women are into a bit of girl on girl action.
Or at a brothel.
On the other hand, women can sometimes be insatiable. This is why they enjoy getting bunned. The right combination of factors can almost have them (use media watch terminology) gagging for it. But your own male biology should at least suggest to you that you have an expiry limit & a recovery time. Many women do not have this. They also have 3 orifices. Its purely a numbers game, that turns into a sex game where everybody ends up happy.