I grew up in PNG and I can safely say that the idea of an NRL team over there should not happen for most of the above reasons.
That being said, there's a surprising amount of ignorance in this thread. The reason the government is so keen on the idea is that it would represent the people coming together as a country. I doubt many Australians could grasp this concept with how spoilt we are in terms of quality sporting competitions. I have seen arguments rage over which state is better in Origin from people who have never seen Australia. Not saying you shouldn't have an opinion but every man and his dog can go on Wikipedia and dig up some country stats that reveal dick all.
It's always worthy of a discussion beave.I swear every 2nd month some moron brings this up, PNG aint gonna f#$king happen.
I have papuan friends, they are great.
pity its a third world country
Cities that should get an NRL team before PNG:
- Perth
- Adelaide
- Darwin
- Gosford
- Wagga
- Albury
- Ipswich
- Toowoomba
- Sunshine Coast
- Rockhampton
- Geelong
- Cranbourne
- Hobart
- Launceston
- Wellington
- Christchurch
- Dunedin
- Tokyo
- Osaka
- Singapore
- Hong Kong
I don't get the logic of people writing off PNG just because it's a third world country. I'd suggest the majority of you have never even been to a third world country.
Professional sport works in the third world, just look at football throughout the world. There is 6.5 million people in PNG, that is a massive a market, despite the fact they are mostly very poor.
If you look at the actual size of the economy, it's not much smaller that say the Sutherland Shire, and probably a bigger economy than Townsville or Darwin.
If Townsville can have an NRL team, then I've got no doubt that financially PNG can support one. Sure there will be issues in terms of players wanting to live there, but the colour and new international dimension they would bring to the comp would certainly outweigh any negatives.
Plenty of third world countries have great teams in other sports. Look at some of the soccer teams in the poorer African and South American nations for example.
To say a PNG team would fail because it's a third world country is pretty much no more than an opinion.
Good debate.
If a Third World Country can compete at the Olympics, then why not in the NRL?
The underlying issue is infrastructure in Port Moresby. The NRL are not going to build a home stadium, that's not their business.
The ball is the court of the PNG government.
And that's the problem right there. A market could have a 100m people but if virtually none of them can afford to buy anything more than the next meal and the roof over their head (and plenty can't afford even that) then the market isn't worth anything. In a professional league that costs upwards of $15m per year to get a team on the field, the money to pay for that ultimately comes from the people who follow the competition. What makes a team worth sponsoring or television rights worth buying is that the people who follow that team or follow that competition have enough money to buy the products that sponsors and advertisers are selling. If the people can't afford those products then the sponsorship and television rights aren't worth anything and no money flows through to pay for the team. More directly, if the people can't afford tickets to watch games live or afford merchandise, then again no money flows through to pay for the team.There is 6.5 million people in PNG, that is a massive a market, despite the fact they are mostly very poor.
Good debate.
If a Third World Country can compete at the Olympics, then why not in the NRL?
The underlying issue is infrastructure in Port Moresby. The NRL are not going to build a home stadium, that's not their business.
The ball is the court of the PNG government.