SharkShocked
Bench
- Messages
- 4,764
And what is wrong with that?
A consistent statement not against the development but against its scale and size. That seems to be the middle ground and a reasonable approach.
At the same time and I think in a related argument, Irvine talks up the jobs to be created. A case of double standards?
Yet they were disappointed and confused when Irvine said that they had colluded in making the statements.
I have no problem with them making their statements, but it was clearly a blitzkreig strategy, whereas you cannot see the this. Goggles?
C'mon mate, pull the other one.