Just a thought - were the Mayans all Knights supporters?
Loudstrat - I think you'll find Hunter Venues were taking action against the Knights for being arrears on rent around the time the takeover was being mooted. I think we were probably trading insolvent...
I thought there was a dispute that the Knights took action over because construction work at the then Energy Australia Stadium reduced ground capacity, and therefore potential revenue for them - and there was no reduction in rental fees for the ground during this time. Happy to be corrected if I am wrong though.
I also understand that Hunter Venues have launched legal action to recover $600 000 in outstanding rent that was accrued during the 2012 season - which Tinkler did not pay.
I also know for a fact that Hunter Venues did not sue for unpaid rent before Tinkler took over.
Plus your general attitude in this thread is showing you don't have anything factual or quality to add to the discussion. You are just looking like a moron. Walk away for your own sake champ.
What general attitude - my refusal to swallow Tinklers load? Or the attitude that some of you have where the Bible needs to be amended so that the word "Jesus" is replaced by the word "Nafan"?
He would have eaten all the loaves and fishes himself anyway.
Geez Loudtwat.
You really are a premature ejaculator aren't you,
Maybe, but your intellect is not even inspiring a minor hard on.
Your love of all things Hillbilly is admirable too.
Your beloved Nafan is so hillbilly that he'd make Malcolm Naden look like a latte sipping Roosters supporter!
Do you know how much the debt for the Knights was before Tinkler took over?
No, because you wont tell me, and besides it is irellevent. I thought the Knights/Tinkler deal was to clear all existing debts, and for Tinkler to fund all the bills after that, because he f*cking owns them. Clearly he hasnt, and a court date has been set to wind them up.
Do you prepay your electricity, rates, phone, water bills etc or do you wait till the last minute/final notice to pay.
Neither. I pay the third option which you dont seem to think exists. I pay when the first bill comes in.
I bet you utilise the fourth option - dont pay any bills and hope the Mayans were right.
Don't try to compare the above question to Nathan Tinkler's situation. That is not why I have asked you that question.
Then why the f*ck did you ask it? Whats next - a "relevant" question on when I worm my cat???????
Now, as far as your ongoing and obvious concern for the Tinkler unpaid tax bill, you will still receive your dole payment whether or not he pays up. The federal government looks after people like you - unfortunately.
Dole :lol: Sorry mate, full time employee, that pays tax. Happy to contribute too, unlike Nafan. Someone has to pay for the asylum that keeps dribblers like you out of lifeline bins.
Spot the brain cell said:
Your tendency to dodge simple questions may explain the intelligence of the decisions made at Parra over the past two and half decades. You seem to be representative of the attitude and mind set of those responsible for running that club into the ground. No trophies there for a generation. Dumb, dumb,dumb.
Are you saying that you not having any awareness of the ability to pay a bill when it's due won you a comp in 01?
Oh the irony of you saying that
our club has been run into the ground. We can pay our tax bill AND yours :lol:
Other than a couple of resident genius's no-one actually believes that the Knights will die.
The Knights will not die, but it will have more to do with the ARLC helping them if the old board cant wrest control back. Tinkler has as much ability to pay those bills as he has of fitting into Wayne Bennett's jeans.
What I am stunned about most is how some posters seem to have more loyalty to Tinkler than the club.
And I reckon they are probably Tinkler plants. No rational Knights supporter would be comfortable with the current situation. The fat idiot has not paid a cent of the bills owed by the club
except player payments - the one thing the games bosses will punt a club for.
The problem is that Nathan has had so much reposessed that he's probably living in a Lifeline bin in Singapore in his last pair of undies. All he has left is his Whitehaven shares tucked in his crack that can only be transferred into cash if they pay a dividend, or he sells them. And if he goes bankrupt, it will get sucked up by the growing hoards of creditors who are using the courts to get their pound of flesh back.