What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recent content by Barney Stubble

  1. B

    The Game Future NRL Stadiums part II

    Fair enough , the costing was not really clear in the X post tho , its a wonderful boutique ground even now , I was in a hotel near by a few weeks ago with great views marvelling at it , so enclosed & intimate that 2 tier Nthn stand extended down the eastern hill to whatever they do with...
  2. B

    Rumoured Signings

    and way more where they are upheld
  3. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Then he shouldn't have agreed to the terms of the release the eels put to him he did story ends
  4. B

    Rumoured Signings

    The tigers being dumb is a fact not a boast , The eels were not dumb & covered their bases , that is also a fact .. So the high moral ground is not relevant here .....
  5. B

    The Game Future NRL Stadiums part II

    2 new stands for ......... 17 million ? you couldn't build them for 170 million knock down the hill & extend the Nthn stand around to the sthn stand increasing the capacity to 25000 plus
  6. B

    Rumoured Signings

    nope they won't
  7. B

    Rumoured Signings

    The law must be seen to be fair to both parties & also balance the validity of contracts Clubs don't have to release players from a legal contract , they choose to for a myriad of reasons , Some choose to hold their ground too & hold players to what they signed.. The Raiders are case in point...
  8. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Yea eels smart Tigers dumb now you're getting it
  9. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Your Honour we didn't agree to release Mr Lomax & weaken our roster only for another of our opponents to pick him up & strengthen theirs. We have no issue with Mr Lomax earning a living outside the NRL , but we released him in good faith with conditions , that he agreed to , that his release...
  10. B

    Rumoured Signings

    The offer wasn't acceptable to one of the parties. case closed
  11. B

    Rumoured Signings

    The Tigers sought no conditions to release those players , thats on them , their business Parramatta did it differently thats how it aint the same
  12. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Did those players have conditional releases ? no? then it aint the same
  13. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Based on the legalities of contracts & what BOTH parties agreed to Absolutely it is acceptable It is not a restraint of trade when Parramatta are not stopping Lomax earning a living
  14. B

    Rumoured Signings

    Again.. no luck required Lomax agreed to the terms of his release , its another comp til 2029 or Parramatta get a player from which ever NRL club wants him , whether that is the Storm or whoever These are the only acceptable terms for the eels.
  15. B

    Rumoured Signings

    The only one needing luck is Lomax Parramattas case is water tight
See more

Latest posts

Top