KaboobieGarfunkelShazam

sorry sando - havent been on that part of the page. doing it now.

well u still havnt accepted my friend request.. so r u going too..

Why not Sando, why not . . .

While I never agreed on what you said last week, your enthusiasm and energy and ultimate triumph for your "moderator" campaign was entertaining to watch

sweet
so can we b pals now

(Couldn't post it all in first attempt = too long), continues . . .

Who knows, maybe when you settle down with all your misguided perceptions of injustice against Parramatta, and you are sledging some other poor team, we may be the bestest of chums until the next encounter!

But all the best nevertheless. If anything, I know there tends to be a bit of entertaining action to be read around your posts . . . and I am all for that!

If I step out of line, and you ban me - so be it Sando . . . so be it . . .

I can always just come along and have a read in any event. And that will be good enough for me.

To be honest, I wasn't sure if I wanted to be your "buddy", as I found your views on the "best team lost"; "ref decisions on Friday Night", supposed "Crusher" tackles on Tuiaki unpalatable to my Parramatta sensibililities.

I don't know if I could befriend someone with such obscure and twisted views on what should merely have been seen as a cracking game of football. I respect the Tigers for the game they played; there were questionable decisions in both directions - it seems, the same can't be said about you in respect to the Mighty Eels.

Think of it as a difference in "religous beliefs" - an analogy would be you as an American Right Wing Christian and I as a fundamental Muslim (or vice versa if you please). With your beliefs in this instance, which I find blasphemour, I just don't think we can get along . . .

Not once did i attempt exortion. It was a simple warning to keep you in line as it would be a waste if you were banned from the forums.

In fact, I have tried to make admends by adding you to my buddy list but you seem to have refused as you do not want to get along yet have a public fight

I thought it important for the punters to know: ie/ it's newsworthy - that their new moderator's new found powers are perhaps going to their head.

Surely the job as moderator, does not entail extortion and strong-arming, with the powers inherent to the position, which I would imagine were not designed for that purpose?

That would just be plain abuse, wouldn't it?

no i am not a bully. and i think it was highly innappropriate for u 2 copy the message on another thread. it was just a verbal warning as u have been trying to stir me up lately. im sure we can get along alrite

So you are going to use your "powers" for evil not good, and proceed with such bully tactics?

Sando! Really now . . .

mate im a mod now. if u want to cause some sh*t go ahead, u will be brought down all the way back down to china town

Champ, you shouldn't go stirring the pot so much, if you can't stomach the broth . . .

mate i know ur a nerd and all but u reckon u could cut it down a bit