What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

australia don't want to host GB

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
rumour is its the players union that does'nt want any of its members to ANY post season internationals in 2015
 

CC_Roosters

First Grade
Messages
5,221
rumour is its the players union that does'nt want any of its members to ANY post season internationals in 2015

If that is true its pretty horrendus. didnt they get the message from the 75k at old Trafford six months ago?

Stupidity

Where is this rumour coming from spud?
 

1 Eyed TEZZA

Coach
Messages
12,420
If that is true its pretty horrendus. didnt they get the message from the 75k at old Trafford six months ago?

Stupidity

Where is this rumour coming from spud?

Even if it's true, I'd be surprised it will go ahead considering the increase in rep match payments.

And I'd be amazed if it's 2015. I'd imagine it would be the year before the world cup, 2016. That's the year they've always wanted off.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
theres already contracts in place,signed by the ARLC, to play a 4nations in 2016 so they can't have that year off...

also the union bullied NZ out of hosting england for a tour in 2012....can see the same happening to france now who are due to tour nz in 2015.....
 

1 Eyed TEZZA

Coach
Messages
12,420
theres already contracts in place,signed by the ARLC, to play a 4nations in 2016 so they can't have that year off...

also the union bullied NZ out of hosting england for a tour in 2012....can see the same happening to france now who are due to tour nz in 2015.....

I don't know why you get so worked up over it. The players are looking out for themselves above promoting the game. They are in a strong enough position to do this. So they do it.

It's just bargaining. They're jostling for position.

Let them play it out. Either some test matches won't be played or players get paid some more.

The only players that won't want to play are the regular rep players who don't need an extra $50k...the pricks.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
i get worked up because in no other sport does this happen...

if players don't want to play then fine rule themselves out,if australia have to play a "weakend" side then fine,send the pm13 team...christ thats the last game most of them play for 6 months...but don't stop other nations from playing!...

in 2012 the union effectively banned 7 countries from playing...thats criminal,we're aren't in a position to take a year out!
 

1 Eyed TEZZA

Coach
Messages
12,420
i get worked up because in no other sport does this happen...

if players don't want to play then fine rule themselves out,if australia have to play a "weakend" side then fine,send the pm13 team...christ thats the last game most of them play for 6 months...but don't stop other nations from playing!...

in 2012 the union effectively banned 7 countries from playing...thats criminal,we're aren't in a position to take a year out!

It's a players union, made up of players from many nations, not just Australia. Your continued bashing of Australia is just pathetic.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
Not as pathetic as the complete disreguard for international RL the people who run the sport down there have...
 

Rodney

Juniors
Messages
243
You have no idea.
Australia have almost been pushing the horse and cart solo for a while now.
The NRL has a whole week dedicated to representative competition and Australia play the most test matches of any current rugby league playing nation (may be matched by NZ).

England haven't moved their asses since they lost in the semi-final last year.
I realize that their neighbors are below par, but NZ is well below the level of Aus and matches between us and them still go ahead.

England really needs to develop local tithes, Australia and New Zealand can't be the only port of calls for whenever they feel like playing a test match.
 

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
its ok guys we'll do all the work as per usual.....you lot just sit back and whinge international RL isn't as good as bush footy...


ps.... by "we" i mean the northern hemisphere
 

1 Eyed TEZZA

Coach
Messages
12,420
its ok guys we'll do all the work as per usual.....you lot just sit back and whinge international RL isn't as good as bush footy...


ps.... by "we" i mean the northern hemisphere

Yeah, and by you lot, you're talking to fans who have virtually no say in the governance of Rugby League in the southern hemisphere.

Idiot.
 

mickey22

Juniors
Messages
6
Not as pathetic as the complete disreguard for international RL the people who run the sport down there have...


What like England inventing a team of overseas has beens and fringe players and calling them the "EXILES" and dressing them in Robes and suggesting some Medieval theme?:lol:

Even the busted Bum "Exiles" won 2 from 4 with crowds of 14k, 11k, 8k and 8k if you can believe those numbers.

They could have just played their neighbour France and tried to build that Country into what it could be.
Or Maybe Wales, or Scotland or Ireland?

Its easier to blame Australia for not showing up or building up the "Pacific Islands" I guess.

The fact that France has done so badly at Test level in the last decade with a team in the ESL says more about the game in England than anything else.

English Leagues main headlines are about Clubs going bankrupt or barely hanging on as they wait for new Stadiums for the last 20 years in small Towns that have no chance of ever filling them.

Best look to your own backyard before worrying about what a successful Comp is doing.

Maybe Aussies don't rate England based on their performance in the last two lifetimes?
 
Last edited:

roughyedspud

Coach
Messages
12,181
sod it im bored


What like England inventing a team of overseas has beens and fringe players and calling them the "EXILES" and dressing them in Robes and suggesting some Medieval theme?:lol:

Even the busted Bum "Exiles" won 2 from 4 with crowds of 14k, 11k, 8k and 8k if you can believe those numbers.

france actually pulled out of playing mid season tests against us....and playing the exiles was better than wacking france,wales by 50+

They could have just played their neighbour France and tried to build that Country into what it could be.
Or Maybe Wales, or Scotland or Ireland?

between england & england knights ( our 2nd team) we've played all these nations several times in the past few years

Its easier to blame Australia for not showing up or building up the "Pacific Islands" I guess.

im glad you agree....when you consider the nations you think we haven't been building up have played around 50 tests between them since 2008...its very easy to blame australia for not building up the pacific island....

The fact that France has done so badly at Test level in the last decade with a team in the ESL says more about the game in England than anything else.

English Leagues main headlines are about Clubs going bankrupt or barely hanging on as they wait for new Stadiums for the last 20 years in small Towns that have no chance of ever filling them.

Best look to your own backyard before worrying about what a successful Comp is doing.

you obviously have no idea how much debt NRL clubs carry....you'll be shocked if you knew

Maybe Aussies don't rate England based on their performance in the last two lifetimes?

maybe we didn't rate australia when GB went on a similar run from the 20s to 60s..

swings and roundabouts pal
 

Rodney

Juniors
Messages
243
Northern Hemisphere internationals are nothing more than domestic supplements within the schengen zone.
They are good, but nothing spectacular in terms of competetive progress. They are more or less a domestic excercise with those playing unlikely to be picked as a nations best XIII including heritage and overseas players.
Southern hemisphere internationals are the full deal, with nations recruiting full strength (or as close to without the assistance of Super League players) sides to play out tournaments and tests with all the bells and whistles.
The former is good for local growth and rewarding domestic achievement, the later tries to create as high quality competition as possible to try and add to the credibility of international rugby league.
Both are useful, and both hemispheres should be trying to incorporate the other (even if only a little).
 

Rodney

Juniors
Messages
243
Having said that, The Southern Hemisphere style is takes much more heavy lifting and investment than the current northern hemisphere modus operendi.
 
Top