What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumoured/Confirmed Signings and More Crap XX

Status
Not open for further replies.

Y2Eel

First Grade
Messages
8,176
The NRL refs just need to learn the rules and give you some more info why they made the call incorrect or not..
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
59,225
Well Manly won a grand final with a rookie 7 and a number 6 in only his second full year of first grade.

It's more than three years later, both players have improved greatly and they've won nothing since.

So did they win in 2011 because they had great halves or did they win because they had decent halves on the cheap?

Hunger desire and less injuries, they have had as good or better side since but less hunger and worse run of injuries.
 

spiderdan

Bench
Messages
3,743
If they weren't cheap the club wouldn't have been able to surround them with:

Stewart
Matai
Lyon
Stewart
Williams
Watmough
Kite
Ballin

As for go-forward, Rose was one of the best in the game. That's why clubs keep signing him despite being a defensive liability who only plays 30 minutes.
together they would've been cheap because Evans was a rookie. it doesn't take away from the quality of the two.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,019
It appears that some of you guys either can't read our forum guidelines, or you have forgotten them, so let's review shall we ?

Firstly as a couple of you have found out the hard way, this is not the place to bitch and moan about how you dont understand the rules. If you care to read them you will note that you can bitch and moan on the contact us link, or email us at forums@leagueunlimited.com.

Secondly, this:

Poops said:
And here's the problem with the age of the internet. The only thing merkins trust is anything with a hyperlink to an article spelling it out for morons. And then they trust every f**king word.

If you cared to read or try and understand our rules, its about liability, nothing to do with accuracy, as the 3rd party link makes the claims, not LU, so therefore the risk/liability on on the 3rd party.

If you don't understand, then ask, but repeated bitching and moaning on the open forums will only lead to suspensions.

Thankyou for understanding.
 

Smegins

Juniors
Messages
3
But where does it say you shall be banned for "Complaining "in a forum thread?

Or even have a post removed?
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,019
But where does it say you shall be banned for "Complaining "in a forum thread?

Or even have a post removed?

Firstly there is this near the very top

The deal...
It is essential that members adhere to Moderator instructions.
Failure to comply with moderator instructions will result in an expulsion warning or immediate suspension.
Please note that decisions regarding these guidelines are done at Admin's discretion.

if you have a post deleted, you generally get an explanation, you post it again you have ignored the moderators instructions which means you could be suspended,

sometimes you dont get an explanation, this only happens its blatantly obvious, assuming you have read the rules

and for those trying to implicate a certain exsBronco player in the cocaine scandal

The Legal stuff...
DEFAMATION AND NAMING NAMES
Implicating a person or persons by way of naming names is forbidden.
In this regard, we refer to spreading unfounded rumours, innuendo or over speculation.
It also refers to repeating private conversations, or something that your 'Dad's mate heard down at the pub'.

Members are asked to pay particular attention to any post which defames or vilifies a public person or organisation.
Additionally, no links are allowed which have defamatory material.
By defamation, we mean accusations of corruption or any other illegal activity.

then there is this little gem that so many people can't or haven't read

SOURCING MATERIAL, COPYRIGHT & ALLEGATIONS
It is important that members provide a source to back up any claims. Any posted material without a source (URL or published reference) may be removed. By 'material' we mean any text or image which is posted by members in the forums. The removal of any such material is totally at the discretion of the site owners, Admin and Mods of LeagueUnlimited.
SOURCING MATERIAL
Sourcing material means providing due credit to the ORIGINAL source. If that source has an URL (website) link, then the URL must be included. If no URL is available, then the published reference must be included in the post. Please note that while the member posting the published source is entirely responsible for its validity, the Admin and Mods of LeagueUnlimited may remove any post or source reference at their discretion.
IMPORTANT: Sourcing material with an URL link does not mean putting in a link to a third party website. That is, websites, blogs or forums where the original material has been copied from the original publication. In particular, Wikipedia is open sourced and can be edited by readers, and is therefore not considered a reliable source.
In addition, members are restricted from using another publisher's material for the purpose of advertising their own website or publication. (see Advertising)
COPYRIGHT: Where applicable, all material remains the property of the original author and/or publisher. Should the original owner of the material require the removal of their material from the forums, please contact the site owners by email forums@leagueunlimited.com

http://leagueunlimited.com/forum-rules


If you dont know, ask

But dont try and dictate forum content to us
 
Last edited:

Smegins

Juniors
Messages
3
You didnt answer my question though.

In your rules it never said you would have a post removed if you complain about a mod in a forum..

Well it didnt yesterday but I see it has been added today...

You dont generally get an explination You get a 1 liner and then a link to rules. Well this is my understanding as a new member I wouldn't know...
 
Last edited:

spiderdan

Bench
Messages
3,743
sometimes I wonder if a prerequisite for being a mod on here is to be pretty dumb.

twizzle, what's wrong with pou's post which is basically a shot at people who believe whatever they read on the Internet? you don't strike me as an above average intelligence person but are you that slow that such a simple point flew past you?
 

spiderdan

Bench
Messages
3,743
In this regard, we refer to spreading unfounded rumours, innuendo or over speculation.
I would have thought a rumour by its very nature was unfounded. when a rumour is "founded" it stops being a rumour and becomes fact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top