Eelementary
Post Whore
- Messages
- 56,220
What I don't understand these days is you have a guy as good as Daniel Bryan who puts bums on seats in a 3 minute squash match why not do this on a Smackdown if it's for story line progression. People pay to see good matches at "special events" (like this was a promotion more than a ppv so why not give him 20min and entertain the crowd it's what I don't understand. There are 3-4 matches on every ppv like this. There are better matches on RAW/Smackdown these days.
The Undertaker match may not have been the best but at there age it's still pretty good Americans were expecting a match from 10 years ago rather than the attraction for Aussies to see two icons having one last match.
I don't really care about results when I watch wrestling I just want to be entertained and the last 3 years it's died down despite the wrestlers being good. Even roman Reigns I don't mind him and don't care if he is champion or not just want entertainment.
Roman Reigns is a good wrestler, tbh.
Cops a lot of shit because of his mic work, and the fact Vince pushes him to the moon and back - but the guy is a damn good worker.