You are really are not very bright.
You keep referring to "morals" as if I was the one who introduced it to our exchanges.
Go back and have a really good look at the posts between ourselves and you will see quite clearly that you made the initial moral comment which was in relation to De Belin.
in respect of going to church no I didn't nor do I have any need to.
So bak to the Latimore question where you like many others introduce the argument of "he is on minimal money" as some form of justification for his repeated selection.
I don't care how much money he is on I firmly believe we have far better options to explore and it astounds me that doesn't happen and what astounds me more is people are too frightened to lose a game or 2 to bother to find out and in the meantime we lose a few games anyway.
No, no. Your position in regard to the morals of players is well known. That is what you said. I didn't know you were the arbiter of morals but now I know.
So as for Latimore. Being on minimal money would put a question over your morals when you so aggressively denounce him. But mostly he does his job and for the most part, does it well. Can any of the guys you mentioned do it better? Good question. Hard to say at this point.