What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Foxtel to cut Rugby?

Silent Knight

First Grade
Messages
8,182
Time for Australia to cut Rugby.

Foxtel can cut any investment they have in it.

Private schools can start supporting rugby league.

Pete the Pirate can sail off into the blue.
 
Messages
11,392
Foxtel has flagged a cut to its spending on "non-marquee sporting content" and another price rise for customers after its controlling shareholder News Corp revealed the pay TV provider made a financial loss of $417 million in 2018.

News Corp was forced to disclose the information to the ASX Monday morning as it had provided the information to potential lenders as it seeks refinancing for Foxtel debt totalling $US1.68 billion.

Sydney Morning Herald andThe Age revealed that 12 sporting codes benefited from the first instalment of the ad-hoc grant during the 2017-18 financial year: AFL, soccer, rugby union, rugby league, cycling, lawn bowls, surfing, Ironman, surf lifesaving, cricket, basketball and hockey.

A number of sports within those codes – such as the AFL's women's league – have run on free-to-air networks with much larger audiences.

A News Corp spokesperson said: "We are proud of our commitment to supporting women in sport - both on air and on the field - and will continue to do so."

Opposition communications spokesperson Michelle Rowland questioned the $30 million grant in a recent interview with this newspaper.

Foxtel's appetite for sport has driven record deals for top tier sports, including a $1.2 billion deal with Seven West Media last year for broadcast rights to domestic cricket.
Media industry sources believe rights to Super Rugby and Wallabies tests, which expire in 2020, and soccer's A-League competition, could be among the sports affected by Foxtel's move to rein in spending. A Rugby Australia spokesman said: "We are in the very early stages of constructive discussions with Foxtel."

The ASX announcement revealed that Foxtel's lost, excluding a $120 million income tax benefit, $417 million in the 2018 calendar year.

The company highlighted other potential opportunities to cut costs including reducing marketing spending and headcount reductions at ad-selling unit MCN.

The document revealed that Foxtel management is also "reviewing the pricing of its various programming packages, including potential price increases for certain tiers."

Foxtel last raised prices in September last year.

Last week, it emerged News Corp, which owns 65 per cent of Foxtel, handed the pay TV subsidiary a $300 million lifelineto cover debts maturing in April. Telstra, which owns the remaining 35 per cent, did not put any money in.

Earlier this year, Foxtel said it has total borrowings of $US1.68 billion. It had a $US211 million credit facility that expired on April 7, and $US744 million in debt falling due this year.

News Corp's chief financial officer, Susan Panuccio, said on Friday News Corp continued to look at "numerous options to provide Foxtel with more financial flexibility and an optimal capital structure".

The ASX document revealed subscription revenue continues to slide, down to $2.75 billion for the calendar year, compared to $2.87 billion for the year ending June 30.

Advertising revenue has also been on a steady decline while programming costs have risen to more than $1.6 billion for the 2018 calendar year. Around half of this programming cost relates to sports rights and production of this content, it said.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/bu...e-sports-after-417m-loss-20190513-p51msx.html
 

nrlnrl

First Grade
Messages
6,833
Foxtel has flagged a cut to its spending on "non-marquee sporting content" and another price rise for customers after its controlling shareholder News Corp revealed the pay TV provider made a financial loss of $417 million in 2018.

News Corp was forced to disclose the information to the ASX Monday morning as it had provided the information to potential lenders as it seeks refinancing for Foxtel debt totalling $US1.68 billion.

Sydney Morning Herald andThe Age revealed that 12 sporting codes benefited from the first instalment of the ad-hoc grant during the 2017-18 financial year: AFL, soccer, rugby union, rugby league, cycling, lawn bowls, surfing, Ironman, surf lifesaving, cricket, basketball and hockey.

A number of sports within those codes – such as the AFL's women's league – have run on free-to-air networks with much larger audiences.

A News Corp spokesperson said: "We are proud of our commitment to supporting women in sport - both on air and on the field - and will continue to do so."

Opposition communications spokesperson Michelle Rowland questioned the $30 million grant in a recent interview with this newspaper.

Foxtel's appetite for sport has driven record deals for top tier sports, including a $1.2 billion deal with Seven West Media last year for broadcast rights to domestic cricket.
Media industry sources believe rights to Super Rugby and Wallabies tests, which expire in 2020, and soccer's A-League competition, could be among the sports affected by Foxtel's move to rein in spending. A Rugby Australia spokesman said: "We are in the very early stages of constructive discussions with Foxtel."

The ASX announcement revealed that Foxtel's lost, excluding a $120 million income tax benefit, $417 million in the 2018 calendar year.

The company highlighted other potential opportunities to cut costs including reducing marketing spending and headcount reductions at ad-selling unit MCN.

The document revealed that Foxtel management is also "reviewing the pricing of its various programming packages, including potential price increases for certain tiers."

Foxtel last raised prices in September last year.

Last week, it emerged News Corp, which owns 65 per cent of Foxtel, handed the pay TV subsidiary a $300 million lifelineto cover debts maturing in April. Telstra, which owns the remaining 35 per cent, did not put any money in.

Earlier this year, Foxtel said it has total borrowings of $US1.68 billion. It had a $US211 million credit facility that expired on April 7, and $US744 million in debt falling due this year.

News Corp's chief financial officer, Susan Panuccio, said on Friday News Corp continued to look at "numerous options to provide Foxtel with more financial flexibility and an optimal capital structure".

The ASX document revealed subscription revenue continues to slide, down to $2.75 billion for the calendar year, compared to $2.87 billion for the year ending June 30.

Advertising revenue has also been on a steady decline while programming costs have risen to more than $1.6 billion for the 2018 calendar year. Around half of this programming cost relates to sports rights and production of this content, it said.
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/bu...e-sports-after-417m-loss-20190513-p51msx.html

Thanks, interesting reading, but obviously has an agenda in a Fairfax publication. I'm sure there'll be a reply in News Corp media in the next few days from their perspective. I don't think they'll disconnect from local rugby or football, it'll just mean rights for those sports won't be given as big a budget. Plus those sports are struggling for viewers as mentioned, bad timing for them with cricket rights given priority in a big way.
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,007
Thanks, interesting reading, but obviously has an agenda in a Fairfax publication. I'm sure there'll be a reply in News Corp media in the next few days from their perspective. I don't think they'll disconnect from local rugby or football, it'll just mean rights for those sports won't be given as big a budget. Plus those sports are struggling for viewers as mentioned, bad timing for them with cricket rights given priority in a big way.

Georgina Robinson is a cheerleader for the 15 a side code. But yeah, 9 quick to point out cricket is failing behind a paywall and they have all the good stuff coming up lol.

If anything, and if there is an agenda, surely the powers that be at 9 realise they need more NRL on tv because it is one of the few things holding foxtel and kayo up. Increasing their broadcast footprint and some incremental uptick on a deal that's not crazy is surely not lost on them?

oh wait, it's channel f**ken 9...
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,409
For me having to pay Rupert for the benefit of watching live rugby league, irritates me no end.

The thought of having to pay more in subs ,is testing my patience.

The trouble is his mob pays the bulk of the TV deals.And rugby league is caught between a rock and a hard place, because it and the AFL ,feel the after effects of other codes who perform poorly on that medium.
 
Last edited:

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,409
Georgina Robinson is a cheerleader for the 15 a side code. But yeah, 9 quick to point out cricket is failing behind a paywall and they have all the good stuff coming up lol.

If anything, and if there is an agenda, surely the powers that be at 9 realise they need more NRL on tv because it is one of the few things holding foxtel and kayo up. Increasing their broadcast footprint and some incremental uptick on a deal that's not crazy is surely not lost on them?

oh wait, it's channel f**ken 9...

Channel 9 is the "HOME" of rugby league.You must show respect and bow to their "outstanding" commitment to the code.
By giving AFL lead in to sport stories, by their Melbourne channel cutting off before speeches are given at NRL G/Fs, by insisting the Magic Round had a Thursday night game, instead of giving fans an opportunity to attend at the weekend.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,849
WTF?

"Foxtel was awarded a $30 million grant in 2017 by the Turnbull government with the aim of boosting women's, niche and emerging sports."

What sort of govt gives $30mill to a paytv operator to "grow" womens sport? Surely that money could have gone to the sports bodies and the sport put on FTA?
 

jargan83

Coach
Messages
14,890
For me having to pay Rupert for the benefit of watching live rugby league, irritates me no end.

The thought of having to pay more in subs ,is testing my patience.

The trouble is his mob pays the bulk of the TV deals.And rugby league is caught between a rock and a hard place, because it and the AFL ,feel the after effects of other codes who perform poorly on that medium.

It irritates me no end as well.

With the reported increase of subscription fee's I've been looking at Kayo and whilst I realize that Kayo is Fox Sports, I won't have to pay for the other garbage on Foxtel that you have to pay for to just to get the sport package.

I bought a new TV in late January with all the streaming apps (Netflix, Stan etc) but Kayo is not supported on my TV nor my PS4 so I've got to look at buying something else to get Kayo on my TV.

It's bad news for Rugby with their TV deal expiring next year I think. Given the test pattern rates better than Super Rugby, Rugby Australia could be staring down the barrel given their recent financial woes.
 

titoelcolombiano

First Grade
Messages
5,334
It irritates me no end as well.

With the reported increase of subscription fee's I've been looking at Kayo and whilst I realize that Kayo is Fox Sports, I won't have to pay for the other garbage on Foxtel that you have to pay for to just to get the sport package.

I bought a new TV in late January with all the streaming apps (Netflix, Stan etc) but Kayo is not supported on my TV nor my PS4 so I've got to look at buying something else to get Kayo on my TV.

It's bad news for Rugby with their TV deal expiring next year I think. Given the test pattern rates better than Super Rugby, Rugby Australia could be staring down the barrel given their recent financial woes.

If you plug a chromecast into your TV you can cast Kayo onto your TV that way.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
65,849
It irritates me no end as well.

With the reported increase of subscription fee's I've been looking at Kayo and whilst I realize that Kayo is Fox Sports, I won't have to pay for the other garbage on Foxtel that you have to pay for to just to get the sport package.

I bought a new TV in late January with all the streaming apps (Netflix, Stan etc) but Kayo is not supported on my TV nor my PS4 so I've got to look at buying something else to get Kayo on my TV.

It's bad news for Rugby with their TV deal expiring next year I think. Given the test pattern rates better than Super Rugby, Rugby Australia could be staring down the barrel given their recent financial woes.

Excuse my techno ignorance but why wont Kayo play on new TV?
 

jargan83

Coach
Messages
14,890
Excuse my techno ignorance but why wont Kayo play on new TV?

Not a compatible device according to Kayo website.

I spoke to one of their customer service reps via online chat this morning and they say they are working on an app for Smart TV's and Consoles but the person had no idea when it would be ready.

If Foxtel up the rates I may look at going and buying a chromecast as indicated by @titoelcolombiano as a cheap-ish option. The missus watches some of the other garbage on Foxtel but she agreed that if they up the rates we'll tell Foxtel where to go.
 
Top