Pomoz
Bench
- Messages
- 2,863
I would have thought they would get cap relief for Burgess and so they should. He can’t play because of his injuries, why should that be included in the cap? Makes no sense. There is no suggestion of an attempt to fiddle the salary cap. Why would any team sign up a player like Burgess on a big contract and then let him go. I’m sure they would rather he was playing. Instead they have an insurance claim to file and a negotiation over a payout.
Why would you want to stop teams retiring injured players and hit them with salary cap restrictions? The punishment these players put their body through deserves sympathy and their plight not turned into a circus for the media to feed on while a player is losing their livelihood. Do we think South’s want to pay 3 years of a huge contract for Burgess while he sits in the stands sipping cocktails?
I feel sorry for players that go through this. 30 years old is no age to stop doing what you love.
Why would you want to stop teams retiring injured players and hit them with salary cap restrictions? The punishment these players put their body through deserves sympathy and their plight not turned into a circus for the media to feed on while a player is losing their livelihood. Do we think South’s want to pay 3 years of a huge contract for Burgess while he sits in the stands sipping cocktails?
I feel sorry for players that go through this. 30 years old is no age to stop doing what you love.