I'm not responsible for any of your mincy dot points but it's only fair that we also do a HJ dossier:
Yes, you are. Don't you even remember what you post? Do you have so little mental capacity?
- Says that 'low confidence = no confidence'. Changes the topic when someone points out that there is also a 'very low confidence' making the concept of 'low confidence = no confidence' complete bullshit.[/quote]
I quoted the Guidance Notes showing my position was right regarding how to interpret low confidence.
- Constantly trying to convince us that he has read all of the documents when its clear he hasn't based on his amateurish interpretations that can be dismantled in 5 min.
I've read all of them, as proof of how I can mention them and subsequently quote them. None of my claims have ended up being non-sourced.
- Sources information from facebook.
Once again, the original graphs were both fully sourced. But you keep trying to nitpick and find ways to ignore me.
- Randomly spews forth meaningless graphs and asks lots of questions but never delivers any solid answers of his own.
Meaningless graphs? From NASA, the IPCC, EPA and DoE? Haha, this one by itself proves your position is empty.
- Has been schooled on multiple occassions by a guy with only a passing interest in the topic, but much superior intelligence.
I haven't been schooled once. I have never been proven wrong. Not once. Once again - sourced everything and it all fits together very nicely. I don't run in circles, I don't mince words. I provide data and it sticks.
- When he feels cornered and under the pump he fails to respond. If you are persistent enough and force him to reply he usually offers a two pronged approach of shit:
- Claims that he is time poor and it is beneath him to 'argue' (i.e. explain himself). I wonder how he gets all that time to read IPCC reports?
I read in the evening. Posting is only for early in the morning for 10 minutes. You can check that - see how often I am here outside the 6am-ish timeslot.
- Then laughingly claims that he is just trolling you. By doing this he is deflecting from his failure to grasp something and trying to make it about those that are asking the questions. "What do you mean that's wrong? You do realise I am just trolling you!"
I'm never wrong. Have not been shown to be wrong once. And you don't understand the mindset - you fools are hilarious to play with. You see, we're the counterculture, now, and any student of history knows that the counterculture has a great time trolling the establishment.
Keep em' coming HJ. I admire your continued bravado in the face of such a pathetic display of incompetence.
Thanks, data-less boy.
You keep screaming at the sky and making predictions that haven't come true for the last 3 decades. Everything continues to fall my way - the ice caps aren't melting, it's not getting hotter, the seas aren't rising, the earth is getting greener and not more desolate, crops are increasing and we're not in famines, droughts are decreasing and not killing us all.
I'm content to be patient and have a little fun on the way. We both already know that history will end up on my side, but you're just frantically trying to take control while you still have the public narrative.
You will fail. I will will succeed.