What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Rumours Thread

Gareth67

Gareth67

First Grade
Messages
8,407
SIR LANCELOT said:
Decent Big Forwards should be the priority.Without them we are stuffed.Cannot see it improving much next year.Not much out there to recruit.Our club as usual way behind the eight ball.:(:(:(
Click to expand...

Agree SIR LANCELOT , they should be more proactive , more so when when you consider that the impressive WIN corporation is one of the partners in the Joint Venture .

The TPAs that they could provide to a prospective Dragon acquisition must be many and varied under their enormous media umbrella ?
 
Last edited:
Dragon David

Dragon David

First Grade
Messages
7,588
SIR LANCELOT said:
Decent Big Forwards should be the priority.Without them we are stuffed.Cannot see it improving much next year.Not much out there to recruit.Our club as usual way behind the eight ball.:(:(:(
Click to expand...
Like, it is so obvious that blind Freddy (sorry Freddy) would know that next year won't see us making anywhere near the top 8 UNLESS we get the forwards - big, brutal, attitude, mongrel, you name it and we have given so many adjectives/nouns to describe the type that we need on this Forum.

The good ones do not appear to be coming because either they don't see us being successful and reject us or they get better deals elsewhere, so basically we are left with the dregs as usual and again we fail - not acting quick and decisive enough. The young juniors cannot win games by themselves.
 
S

slippery5

Juniors
Messages
1,665
Maddragon99 said:
It’s difficult to judge anyone too harshly when you consider the coaching over the past decade. Anyone that was graded after 2011 has had some of the worst coaching in the NRL.

Defence is an attitude & the teams attitude is the coaches responsibility. That’s why our middle defence is marshmallow soft.

I liked Sailor, he was never given a chance. It could easily been Sailor picked instead of Clune.

Clune debuted at 25 Sailor is only 20 or 21.

Anyway like I said good luck to him
Click to expand...
Agree to a certain extant because I don't think Clune or Norman are better options & he should have been given a chance ahead of them, but unfortunately they have existing contracts & Sailor doesn't, so it's simply a case of last man in is out.
 
Ghostrider22

Ghostrider22

Juniors
Messages
519
Maddragon99 said:
It’s difficult to judge anyone too harshly when you consider the coaching over the past decade. Anyone that was graded after 2011 has had some of the worst coaching in the NRL.

Defence is an attitude & the teams attitude is the coaches responsibility. That’s why our middle defence is marshmallow soft.

I liked Sailor, he was never given a chance. It could easily been Sailor picked instead of Clune.

Clune debuted at 25 Sailor is only 20 or 21.

Anyway like I said good luck to him
Click to expand...
I reckon Sailor deserves better from the dragons
 
Forbes Creek Dragons

Forbes Creek Dragons

First Grade
Messages
5,078
slippery5 said:
Agree to a certain extant because I don't think Clune or Norman are better options & he should have been given a chance ahead of them, but unfortunately they have existing contracts & Sailor doesn't, so it's simply a case of last man in is out.
Click to expand...
Agree, I’m sure if we didn’t have Norman he’d be retained. That or we’d throw the sink at Burton...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top